SEC Filing | TriMas Corporation

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

Trimas_093011_10Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



(Mark One)
x		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011
Or
o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Transition Period from to .

Commission file number 001-10716

TRIMAS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		38-2687639 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 130

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(248) 631-5450

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of October 27, 2011, the number of outstanding shares of the Registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, was 34,608,263 shares.

Table of Contents

TriMas Corporation

Index



Part I.	Financial Information

		Forward-Looking Statements	2

	Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements	3

		Consolidated Balance Sheet-September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	3

		Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	4

		Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	5

		Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011	6

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	49

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	49

Part II.	Other Information and Signatures

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	50

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	50

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	50

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	50

	Item 4.	Reserved	50

	Item 5.	Other Information	50

	Item 6.	Exhibits	51

	Signature		56

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements (as that term is defined by the federal securities laws) about our financial condition, results of operations and business. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and similar words used in this report.

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Because the statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on the statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.

The cautionary statements set forth above should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue. We do not undertake any obligation to review or confirm analysts' expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors," in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deemed to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations or cash flows.

We disclose important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations under Part I, Item 2., "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and elsewhere in this report. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributed to us or persons acting on our behalf. When we indicate that an event, condition or circumstance could or would have an adverse effect on us, we mean to include effects upon our business, financial and other condition, results of operations, prospects and ability to service our debt.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

TriMas Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheet

(Unaudited—dollars in thousands)



	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,540		$	46,370
Receivables, net of reserves of approximately $4.1 million and $4.4 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively	151,970			111,380
Inventories	173,770			155,980
Deferred income taxes	23,590			34,500
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	6,720			6,670
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale	32,850			30,360
Total current assets	399,440			385,260
Property and equipment, net	157,180			149,290
Goodwill	215,920			205,890
Other intangibles, net	158,870			159,910
Other assets	26,450			23,810
Total assets	$	957,860		$	924,160
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current maturities, long-term debt	$	2,920		$	17,730
Accounts payable	119,420			124,390
Accrued liabilities	72,620			66,600
Liabilities of discontinued operations	5,470			5,710
Total current liabilities	200,430			214,430
Long-term debt	473,040			476,920
Deferred income taxes	67,790			63,880
Other long-term liabilities	54,210			56,610
Total liabilities	795,470			811,840
Preferred stock $0.01 par: Authorized 100,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding: None	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par: Authorized 400,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding: 34,596,088 shares at September 30, 2011 and 34,065,856 shares at December 31, 2010	340			340
Paid-in capital	537,580			531,030
Accumulated deficit	(418,000		)	(465,110		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	42,470			46,060
Total shareholders' equity	162,390			112,320
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	957,860		$	924,160

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

TriMas Corporation

Consolidated Statement of Operations

(Unaudited—dollars in thousands, except for share amounts)



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales	$	277,660		$	237,730		$	824,310		$	689,950
Cost of sales	(195,720		)	(165,660		)	(582,260		)	(481,150		)
Gross profit	81,940			72,070			242,050			208,800
Selling, general and administrative expenses	(46,170		)	(40,130		)	(137,180		)	(117,170		)
Gain (loss) on dispositions of property and equipment	20			(210		)	50			(930		)
Operating profit	35,790			31,730			104,920			90,700
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(10,730		)	(12,550		)	(34,370		)	(39,780		)
Debt extinguishment costs	—			—			(3,970		)	—
Gain on bargain purchase	—			—			—			410
Other, net	540			(200		)	(1,170		)	(1,230		)
Other income (expense), net	(10,190		)	(12,750		)	(39,510		)	(40,600		)
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense	25,600			18,980			65,410			50,100
Income tax expense	(8,620		)	(7,030		)	(21,730		)	(18,800		)
Income from continuing operations	16,980			11,950			43,680			31,300
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense	1,290			770			3,430			8,280
Net income	$	18,270		$	12,720		$	47,110		$	39,580
Earnings per share—basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.49		$	0.36		$	1.28		$	0.93
Discontinued operations	0.04			0.02			0.10			0.24
Net income per share	$	0.53		$	0.38		$	1.38		$	1.17
Weighted average common shares—basic	34,417,879			33,827,939			34,182,592			33,730,852
Earnings per share—diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.49		$	0.35		$	1.26		$	0.91
Discontinued operations	0.03			0.02			0.10			0.24
Net income per share	$	0.52		$	0.37		$	1.36		$	1.15
Weighted average common shares—diluted	34,901,277			34,512,820			34,736,307			34,380,188

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

TriMas Corporation

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(Unaudited—dollars in thousands)



	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	47,110		$	39,580
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, net of acquisition impact:
Gain on dispositions of property and equipment	(30		)	(9,080		)
Gain on bargain purchase	—			(410		)
Depreciation	19,160			17,670
Amortization of intangible assets	10,780			10,600
Amortization of debt issue costs	2,230			2,200
Deferred income taxes	10,580			14,480
Debt extinguishment costs	3,970			—
Non-cash compensation expense	2,580			1,050
Increase in receivables	(39,080		)	(31,370		)
Increase in inventories	(13,500		)	(3,150		)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets	(2,320		)	(1,770		)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(4,750		)	19,340
Other, net	(1,180		)	2,460
Net cash provided by operating activities, net of acquisition impact	35,550			61,600
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	(23,520		)	(11,090		)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	(28,620		)	(12,760		)
Net proceeds from disposition of assets	2,240			14,720
Net cash used for investing activities	(49,900		)	(9,130		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on term loan facilities	226,520			—
Repayments of borrowings on term loan facilities	(250,170		)	(10,040		)
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facilities and accounts receivable facility	551,900			376,430
Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facilities and accounts receivable facility	(547,020		)	(382,130		)
Debt financing fees	(6,680		)	—
Shares surrendered upon vesting of options and restricted stock awards to cover tax obligations	(830		)	(240		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	960			100
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation	3,840			440
Net cash used for financing activities	(21,480		)	(15,440		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Increase (decrease) for the period	(35,830		)	37,030
At beginning of period	46,370			9,480
At end of period	$	10,540		$	46,510
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	25,350		$	27,710
Cash paid for taxes	$	12,140		$	6,260

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

TriMas Corporation

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

(Unaudited—dollars in thousands)



	Common Stock		Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total
Balances, December 31, 2010	$	340	$	531,030		$	(465,110	)	$	46,060		$	112,320
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—			47,110			—			47,110
Amortization of defined benefit plan deferred losses (net of tax of $0.1 million) (Note 13)	—		—			—			170			170
Foreign currency translation	—		—			—			(3,990		)	(3,990		)
Amortization of unrealized loss on interest rate swaps (net of tax of $0.1 million) (Note 8)	—		—			—			230			230
Total comprehensive income												43,520
Shares surrendered upon vesting of options and restricted stock awards to cover tax obligations	—		(830		)	—			—			(830		)
Stock option exercises and restricted stock vestings	—		960			—			—			960
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation	—		3,840			—			—			3,840
Non-cash compensation expense	—		2,580			—			—			2,580
Balances, September 30, 2011	$	340	$	537,580		$	(418,000	)	$	42,470		$	162,390

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

TriMas Corporation ("TriMas" or the "Company"), and its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer and distributor of products for commercial, industrial and consumer markets. The Company is principally engaged in six reportable segments with diverse products and market channels: Packaging, Energy, Aerospace & Defense, Engineered Components, Cequent Asia Pacific and Cequent North America. See Note 10, "Segment Information," for further information on each of the Company's reportable segments.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries and in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments, including adjustments of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company's 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company committed to a plan to exit its precision tool cutting and specialty fittings lines of business, both of which were part of the Engineered Components reportable segment, marketing each line of business for sale.

During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company committed to a plan to exit its medical device line of business which was part of the Engineered Components reportable segment. The business was sold in May 2010 for cash proceeds of $2.0 million, which approximated the net book value of the assets and liabilities sold.

During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company committed to a plan to exit its property management line of business. The sale was completed in April 2010 for cash proceeds of $13.0 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately $10.1 million during the second quarter of 2010.

The results of the aforementioned businesses are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Results of discontinued operations are summarized as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Net sales	$	11,930		$	10,150		$	34,670		$	30,710
Income from discontinued operations before income tax expense	$	2,050		$	1,190		$	5,450		$	13,060
Income tax expense	(760		)	(420		)	(2,020		)	(4,780		)
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense	$	1,290		$	770		$	3,430		$	8,280

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations are summarized as follows:



	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Receivables, net	$	7,470	$	5,660
Inventories	5,780		5,320
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,230		1,160
Property and equipment, net	18,370		18,220
Total assets	$	32,850	$	30,360
Accounts payable	3,990		3,910
Accrued liabilities and other	1,480		1,800
Total liabilities	$	5,470	$	5,710

3. Acquisitions

On August 1, 2011, the Company acquired the stock of Innovative Molding ("Innovative") for the purchase price of $27.0 million. The purchase price remains subject to the finalization of a net working capital adjustment, which is expected to be completed during the first quarter of 2012. Innovative is in the business of designing, lining and manufacturing specialty plastic closures for bottles and jars for the food and nutrition industries, and had approximately $28.3 million in revenue in the twelve months ended May 31, 2011. Innovative is included in the Company's Packaging reportable segment.

On September 13, 2011, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of a standard ring type joint gasket manufacturer located in Faridabad, India for the purchase price of approximately $2.1 million, of which approximately $1.6 million has been paid and approximately $0.5 million is scheduled to be paid by the end of the second quarter of 2012. These assets have been integrated into the Company's Lamons business within the Company's Energy reportable segment.

The results of operations of the aforementioned acquisitions are not significant compared to the overall results of operations of the Company.

4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are summarized as follows:




	Packaging			Energy			Aerospace & Defense		Engineered Components		Cequent Asia Pacific		Cequent North America		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	113,320		$	48,260		$	41,130	$	3,180	$	—	$	—	$	205,890
Goodwill due to acquisitions	9,790			660			—		—		—		—		10,450
Foreign currency translation	(70		)	(350		)	—		—		—		—		(420		)
Balance, September 30, 2011	$	123,040		$	48,570		$	41,130	$	3,180	$	—	$	—	$	215,920

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of the Company's other intangibles as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below. The Company amortizes these assets over periods ranging from 1 to 30 years.



	As of September 30, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
Intangible Category by Useful Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
	(dollars in thousands)
Customer relationships:
5 – 12 years	$	37,280	$	(22,590	)	$	32,220	$	(20,650	)
15 – 25 years	154,610		(75,670		)	154,610		(69,480		)
Total customer relationships	191,890		(98,260		)	186,830		(90,130		)
Technology and other:
1 – 15 years	28,970		(23,350		)	26,480		(22,460		)
17 – 30 years	43,530		(20,300		)	42,460		(18,690		)
Total technology and other	72,500		(43,650		)	68,940		(41,150		)
Trademark/Trade names (indefinite life)	36,390		—			35,420		—
	$	300,780	$	(141,910	)	$	291,190	$	(131,280	)

Amortization expense related to technology and other intangibles was approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2.6 million and $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These amounts are included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Amortization expense related to customer intangibles was approximately $2.8 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $8.2 million and $7.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

5. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following components:



	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Finished goods	$	113,650	$	103,560
Work in process	21,040		19,010
Raw materials	39,080		33,410
Total inventories	$	173,770	$	155,980

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

6. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment consists of the following components:



	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Land and land improvements	$	5,980	$	5,800
Buildings	50,200		49,230
Machinery and equipment	284,330		264,120
	340,510		319,150
Less: Accumulated depreciation	183,330		169,860
Property and equipment, net	$	157,180	$	149,290

Depreciation expense was approximately $6.0 million and $5.2 million, and $17.5 million and $16.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of which $5.3 million and $4.6 million, and $15.3 million and $14.2 million, respectively, is included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, and $0.7 million and $0.6 million, and $2.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively, is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

7. Long-term Debt

The Company's long-term debt consists of the following:



	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
U.S. bank debt	$	229,440	$	248,950
Non-U.S. bank debt and other	750		290
9 3/4% senior secured notes, due December 2017	245,770		245,410
	475,960		494,650
Less: Current maturities, long-term debt	2,920		17,730
Long-term debt	$	473,040	$	476,920

U.S. Bank Debt

The Company is a party to a credit facility consisting of a $110.0 million revolving credit facility, which matures in June 2017 and is subject to interest at London Interbank Offered Rates ("LIBOR") plus 3.25%, and a $225.0 million term loan facility, which matures in June 2016 and is subject to interest at LIBOR plus 3.00% (subject to a 1.25% LIBOR floor) (collectively, the "Credit Facility"). Under the Credit Facility, the Company is also able to issue letters of credit, not to exceed $50.0 million in aggregate, against its revolving credit facility commitments. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had letters of credit of approximately $23.1 million and $23.7 million, respectively, issued and outstanding.

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $5.0 million and $0.0 million, respectively, outstanding under its revolving credit facilities and had an additional $81.9 million and $79.3 million, respectively, potentially available after giving effect to approximately $23.1 million and $23.7 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued and outstanding. However, including availability under its accounts receivable facility and after consideration of leverage restrictions contained in the Credit Facility, the Company had $152.2 million and $120.7 million, respectively, of borrowing capacity available to it for general corporate purposes.

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

The bank debt is an obligation of the Company and its subsidiaries. Although the terms of the Credit Facility do not restrict the Company's subsidiaries from making distributions to it in respect of its 9³/4% senior secured notes, it does contain certain other limitations on the distribution of funds from TriMas Company LLC, the principal subsidiary, to the Company. The restricted net assets of the guarantor subsidiaries of approximately $407.7 million and $336.9 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are presented in Note 15, "Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Information." The Credit Facility also contains various negative and affirmative covenants and other requirements affecting the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company was in compliance with its covenants at September 30, 2011.

The Company's term loan facility traded at approximately 97.3% and 100.3% of par value as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and was valued based on Level 2 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy.

Non-U.S. Bank Debt

In Australia, the Company's subsidiary is party to a debt agreement which matures on March 31, 2012 and is secured by substantially all the assets of the subsidiary. At September 30, 2011, the balance outstanding under this agreement was approximately $0.6 million at an average interest rate of 6.7%. At December 31, 2010, the Company's subsidiary had no amounts outstanding under this debt agreement.

Notes

The Company's 9³/4% senior secured notes due 2017 ("Notes") indenture contains negative and affirmative covenants and other requirements that are comparable to those contained in the Credit Facility. At September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all such covenant requirements.

The Company's Notes traded at approximately 103.0% and 108.5% of par value as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and was valued based on Level 2 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy.

Receivables Facility

The Company is a party to an accounts receivable facility through TSPC, Inc. ("TSPC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary, to sell trade accounts receivable of substantially all of the Company's domestic business operations. The Company amended the facility in September 2011, increasing the committed funding from $75.0 million to $90.0 million, and reducing the margin on amounts outstanding from a range of 2.75%-3.50%, depending on leverage ratio, to a range of 1.50%-1.75% depending on the amount drawn under the facility. The amendment also reduced the cost of the unused portion of the facility from a range of 0.50%-1.00%, depending on usage amount, to 0.45% and extended the maturity date from December 29, 2012 to September 15, 2015. The Company incurred approximately $0.1 million in fees and expenses to complete the amendment.

Under this facility, TSPC, from time to time, may sell an undivided fractional ownership interest in the pool of receivables up to approximately $90.0 million to a third party multi-seller receivables funding company. The net amount financed under the facility is less than the face amount of accounts receivable by an amount that approximates the purchaser's financing costs. The cost of funds under this facility consisted of a 3-month LIBOR-based rate plus a usage fee of 1.50% and 3.00% as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and a fee on the unused portion of the facility of 0.45% and 1.00% as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company did not have any amounts outstanding under the facility as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010, but had $70.3 million and $41.4 million, respectively, available but not utilized. Aggregate costs incurred under the facility were $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $1.4 million and $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

The cost of funds fees incurred are determined by calculating the estimated present value of the receivables sold compared to their carrying amount. The estimated present value factor is based on historical collection experience and a discount rate based on a 3-month LIBOR-based rate plus the usage fee discussed above and is computed in accordance with the terms of the securitization agreement. As of September 30, 2011, the costs of funds under the facility was based on an average liquidation period of the portfolio of approximately 1.6 months and an average discount rate of 1.8%.

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

8. Derivative Instruments

The Company was party to a $125.0 million notional amount interest rate swap which expired in July 2011. The Company was party to a second interest rate swap with a notional amount of $75.0 million which expired in the first quarter of 2011. Both of these swaps were associated with the Company's term loan facility, but during 2011 and 2010 neither was designated as a hedging instrument. In addition, during the first quarter of 2010, the Company was party to two foreign exchange forward contracts which were not designated as hedging instruments.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value carrying amounts of the Company's derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are recorded as follows:



		Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Caption	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
		(dollars in thousands)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate swaps	Accrued liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,130

The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is summarized as follows:



	Amount of Loss Recognized in AOCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion, net of tax)						Amount of Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings
							Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	As of September 30, 2011		As of December 31, 2010			Location of Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings (Effective Portion)	2011		2010			2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)						(dollars in thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate swaps	$	—	$	(230	)	Interest expense	$	—	$	(570	)	$	(360	)	$	(1,860	)



	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivatives
	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,						Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivatives
	2011		2010			2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate swaps	$	—	$	(40	)	$	(10	)	$	(1,600	)	Interest expense
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	50		Other expense, net

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Valuations of the interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts were based on the income approach which uses observable inputs such as interest rate yield curves and forward currency exchange rates. Fair value measurements and the fair value hierarchy level for the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 are shown below. There were no derivative instruments outstanding as of September 30, 2011.



		December 31, 2010
Description	Frequency	Asset / (Liability)			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
		(dollars in thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Recurring	$	(1,130	)	$	—	$	(1,130	)	$	—

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Asbestos

As of September 30, 2011, the Company was a party to 1,101 pending cases involving an aggregate of 8,081 claimants alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos containing materials formerly used in gaskets (both encapsulated and otherwise) manufactured or distributed by certain of the Company's subsidiaries for use primarily in the petrochemical refining and exploration industries. The following chart summarizes the number of claimants, number of claims filed, number of claims dismissed, number of claims settled, the average settlement amount per claim and the total defense costs, exclusive of amounts reimbursed under the Company's primary insurance, at the applicable date and for the applicable periods:



	Claims pending at beginning of period	Claims filed during period	Claims dismissed during period	Claims settled during period	Average settlement amount per claim during period		Total defense costs during period
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010	7,816	892	456	52	$	7,029	$	2,870,000
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011	8,200	379	479	19	$	15,653	$	1,890,000

In addition, the Company acquired various companies to distribute its products that had distributed gaskets of other manufacturers prior to acquisition. The Company believes that many of its pending cases relate to locations at which none of its gaskets were distributed or used.

The Company may be subjected to significant additional asbestos-related claims in the future, the cost of settling cases in which product identification can be made may increase, and the Company may be subjected to further claims in respect of the former activities of its acquired gasket distributors. The Company is unable to make a meaningful statement concerning the monetary claims made in the asbestos cases given that, among other things, claims may be initially made in some jurisdictions without specifying the amount sought or by simply stating the requisite or maximum permissible monetary relief, and may be amended to alter the amount sought. The large majority of claims do not specify the amount sought. Of the 8,081 claims pending at September 30, 2011, 59 set forth specific amounts of damages (other than those stating the statutory minimum or maximum). 34 of the 59 claims sought between $1.0 million and $5.0 million in total damages (which includes compensatory and punitive damages), 20 sought between $5.0 million and $10.0 million in total damages (which includes compensatory and punitive damages) and 5 sought over $10.0 million (which includes compensatory and punitive damages). Solely with respect to compensatory damages, 36 of the 59 claims sought between $50,000 and $600,000, 20 sought between $600,000 and $5.0 million and 3 sought over $5.0 million. Solely with respect to punitive damages, 34 of the 59 claims sought between $1.0 million and $2.5 million, 20 sought between $2.5 million and $5.0 million and 5 sought over $5.0 million. In addition, relatively few of the claims have reached the discovery stage and even fewer claims have gone past the discovery stage.

Total settlement costs (exclusive of defense costs) for all such cases, some of which were filed over 20 years ago, have been

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

approximately $6.1 million. All relief sought in the asbestos cases is monetary in nature. To date, approximately 50% of the Company's costs related to settlement and defense of asbestos litigation have been covered by its primary insurance. Effective February 14, 2006, the Company entered into a coverage-in-place agreement with its first level excess carriers regarding the coverage to be provided to the Company for asbestos-related claims when the primary insurance is exhausted. The coverage-in-place agreement makes asbestos defense costs and indemnity coverage available to the Company that might otherwise be disputed by the carriers and provides a methodology for the administration of such expenses. Nonetheless, the Company believes it is likely there will be a period within the next three years, prior to the commencement of coverage under this agreement and following exhaustion of the Company's primary insurance coverage, during which the Company will be solely responsible for defense costs and indemnity payments, the duration of which would be subject to the scope of damage awards and settlements paid.

Based on the settlements made to date and the number of claims dismissed or withdrawn for lack of product identification, the Company believes that the relief sought (when specified) does not bear a reasonable relationship to its potential liability. Based upon the Company's experience to date, including the trend in annual defense and settlement costs incurred to date, and other available information (including the availability of excess insurance), the Company does not believe these cases will have a material adverse effect on its financial position and results of operations or cash flows.

Ordinary Course Claims

The Company is subject to other claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business, but does not believe that any such claim or litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial position and results of operations or cash flows.

10. Segment Information

TriMas groups its operating segments into reportable segments that provide similar products and services. Each operating segment has discrete financial information evaluated regularly by the Company's chief operating decision maker in determining resource allocation and assessing performance. Within these reportable segments, there are no individual products or product families for which reported net sales accounted for more than 10% of the Company's consolidated net sales. See below for more information regarding the types of products and services provided within each reportable segment:

Packaging-Steel and plastic closure caps, drum enclosures, rings and levers and dispensing systems for industrial and consumer markets.

Energy-Metallic and non-metallic industrial sealant products and bolts and fasteners for the petroleum refining, petrochemical and other industrial markets.

Aerospace & Defense-Highly engineered specialty fasteners and screws for the commercial and military aerospace industries and military munitions components for the defense industry.

Engineered Components-High-pressure and low-pressure cylinders for the transportation, storage and dispensing of compressed gases, and natural gas engines, compressors, gas production equipment and chemical pumps engineered at well sites for the oil and gas industry.

Cequent Asia Pacific & Cequent North America-Custom-engineered towing, trailering and electrical products including trailer couplers, winches, jacks, trailer brakes and brake control solutions, lighting accessories and roof racks for the recreational vehicle, agricultural/utility, marine, automotive and commercial trailer markets, functional vehicle accessories and cargo management solutions including vehicle hitches and receivers, sway controls, weight distribution and fifth-wheel hitches, hitch-mounted accessories and other accessory components.

The Company's management uses Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA") as a primary indicator of financial operating performance and as a measure of cash generating capability. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change and before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, debt extinguishment costs, non-cash asset and goodwill impairment charges and write-offs and non-cash losses on sale-leaseback of property and equipment.

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Segment activity is as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Net Sales
Packaging	$	46,090		$	44,490		$	137,890		$	133,610
Energy	42,690			31,710			125,810			94,400
Aerospace & Defense	20,330			19,170			60,160			53,470
Engineered Components	46,010			30,530			126,870			77,810
Cequent Asia Pacific	26,020			18,280			67,390			57,040
Cequent North America	96,520			93,550			306,190			273,620
Total	$	277,660		$	237,730		$	824,310		$	689,950
Operating Profit (Loss)
Packaging	$	10,240		$	13,140		$	37,140		$	38,480
Energy	4,560			3,100			14,920			11,360
Aerospace & Defense	5,420			5,350			14,000			13,020
Engineered Components	7,730			3,220			19,010			8,630
Cequent Asia Pacific	5,250			2,430			9,720			9,420
Cequent North America	9,580			11,000			30,630			28,180
Corporate expenses	(6,990		)	(6,510		)	(20,500		)	(18,390		)
Total	$	35,790		$	31,730		$	104,920		$	90,700
Adjusted EBITDA
Packaging	$	13,950		$	16,010		$	47,090		$	47,350
Energy	5,010			3,540			15,740			12,640
Aerospace & Defense	6,140			5,770			16,000			14,780
Engineered Components	8,570			4,010			21,640			10,940
Cequent Asia Pacific	6,240			3,240			12,160			11,480
Cequent North America	12,310			14,080			39,100			37,810
Corporate expenses	(6,150		)	(6,450		)	(19,710		)	(18,390		)
Subtotal from continuing operations	46,070			40,200			132,020			116,610
Discontinued operations	2,590			1,870			7,120			15,020
Total company	$	48,660		$	42,070		$	139,140		$	131,630

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

The following is a reconciliation of the Company's net income to Adjusted EBITDA:



	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Net income	$	18,270	$	12,720	$	47,110	$	39,580
Income tax expense	9,380		7,450		23,750		23,580
Interest expense	10,730		12,680		34,370		40,200
Depreciation and amortization	10,280		9,220		29,940		28,270
Debt extinguishment costs	—		—		3,970		—
Adjusted EBITDA, total company	$	48,660	$	42,070	$	139,140	$	131,630
Adjusted EBITDA, discontinued operations	2,590		1,870		7,120		15,020
Adjusted EBITDA, continuing operations	$	46,070	$	40,200	$	132,020	$	116,610

11. Equity Awards

The Company maintains three long-term equity incentive plans, the 2011 TriMas Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, the TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan and the TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (collectively the "Plans"). See below for details of awards under the Plans by type.

Stock Options

The Company did not grant any stock options during the third quarter of 2011. Information related to stock options at September 30, 2011 is as follows:



	Number of Options		Weighted Average Option Price		Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2011	1,742,086		$	10.24
Granted	17,030		21.55
Exercised	(443,821	)	2.17
Cancelled	(17,277	)	16.40
Outstanding at September 30, 2011	1,298,018		$	13.09	4.9	$	7,353,590

As of September 30, 2011, 854,576 stock options were exercisable under the Plans. In addition, the fair value of options which vested during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. No options vested during the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. As of September 30, 2011, there was approximately $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options that is expected to be recorded over a weighted-average period of 0.4 years.

The Company recognized approximately $0.1 million of stock based compensation expense related to options during each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and approximately $0.2 million during each of the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The stock-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations.

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Restricted Shares

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company granted 19,392 restricted shares of its common stock to its non-employee independent directors, which vest one year from date of grant so long as the director and/or Company does not terminate his services prior to the vesting date.

Information related to restricted shares at September 30, 2011 is as follows:



	Number of Unvested Restricted Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2011	249,218		$	6.80
Granted	232,283		19.44
Vested	(155,491	)	5.61
Cancelled	(1,487	)	19.86
Outstanding at September 30, 2011	324,523		$	16.35	2.07	$	4,819,163

As of September 30, 2011, there was approximately $2.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted shares that is expected to be recorded over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.

The Company recognized approximately $0.8 million and $0.2 million of stock based compensation expense related to restricted shares during the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and approximately $2.4 million and $0.8 million for nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The stock-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations.

12. Earnings per Share

Net earnings are divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period to calculate basic earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share are calculated to give effect to stock options and other stock-based awards. The calculation of diluted earnings per share included 156,213 and 132,461 restricted shares for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 114,911 and 111,187 restricted shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The calculation of diluted earnings per share also included 327,185 and 552,420 options to purchase shares of common stock for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 438,803 and 538,149 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

13. Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs for the Company's defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans cover foreign employees, union hourly employees and certain salaried employees. The components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:



	Pension Plans												Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Service costs	$	160		$	150		$	480		$	460		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Interest costs	400			400			1,200			1,190			10			20			30			50
Expected return on plan assets	(400		)	(400		)	(1,210		)	(1,190		)	—			—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost	—			—			10			10			(70		)	(70		)	(200		)	(200		)
Amortization of net loss (gain)	180			110			530			320			(20		)	(10		)	(60		)	(40		)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	340		$	260		$	1,010		$	790		$	(80	)	$	(60	)	$	(230	)	$	(190	)

The Company contributed approximately $0.8 million and $1.8 million to its defined benefit pension plans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The Company expects to contribute approximately $2.3 million to its defined benefit pension plans for the full year 2011.

14. New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-4, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs." ASU 2011-4 amends guidance listed under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement," and represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board on fair value measurement. The guidance clarifies how a principal market is determined, addresses the fair value measurement of instruments with offsetting market or counterparty credit risks, addresses the concept of valuation premise and highest and best use, extends the prohibition on blockage factors to all three levels of the fair value hierarchy and requires additional disclosures. ASU 2011-4 will be effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of ASU 2011-4 and has not yet determined its impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-5, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income." ASU 2011-5 amends guidance listed under ASC Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income" and eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders' equity. Under the amendments to ASC Topic 220, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments also require an entity to present on the face of the financial statements the reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income. ASU 2011-5 will be effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-5 will only affect the presentation of the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

TRIMAS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-8, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing for Goodwill Impairment." ASU 2011-8 gives companies the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, and in some cases, skip the two-step impairment test. The objective of the revised standard is to simplify how an entity tests goodwill for impairment and to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-8 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the potential impact of the revised standard on the Company's annual goodwill impairment test.

15. Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

Under an indenture dated December 29, 2009, TriMas Corporation, the parent company ("Parent"), issued 9³/4% senior secured notes due 2017 in a total principal amount of $250.0 million (face value). The outstanding Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries ("Guarantor Subsidiaries"). All of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Parent and their guarantee is full, unconditional, joint and several. The Company's non-domestic subsidiaries and TSPC, Inc. have not guaranteed the Senior Notes ("Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries"). The Guarantor Subsidiaries have also guaranteed amounts outstanding under the Company's Credit Facility.

The accompanying supplemental guarantor condensed, consolidating financial information is presented using the equity method of accounting for all periods presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the Company's share in the subsidiaries' cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions and other changes in equity. Elimination entries relate primarily to the elimination of investments in subsidiaries and associated intercompany balances and transactions.

Table of Contents

Supplemental Guarantor

Condensed Financial Statements

Consolidating Balance Sheet

(dollars in thousands)



	September 30, 2011
	Parent		Guarantor		Non- Guarantor		Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	120	$	10,420	$	—		$	10,540
Trade receivables, net	—		122,330		29,640		—			151,970
Receivables, intercompany	—		740		—		(740		)	—
Inventories	—		145,270		28,500		—			173,770
Deferred income taxes	—		22,030		1,560		—			23,590
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	—		5,290		1,430		—			6,720
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale	—		32,850		—		—			32,850
Total current assets	—		328,630		71,550		(740		)	399,440
Investments in subsidiaries	407,670		129,600		—		(537,270		)	—
Property and equipment, net	—		105,260		51,920		—			157,180
Goodwill	—		169,270		46,650		—			215,920
Intangibles and other assets	7,670		174,320		5,880		(2,550		)	185,320
Total assets	$	415,340	$	907,080	$	176,000	$	(540,560	)	$	957,860
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current maturities, long-term debt	$	—	$	2,340	$	580	$	—		$	2,920
Accounts payable, trade	—		93,730		25,690		—			119,420
Accounts payable, intercompany	—		—		740		(740		)	—
Accrued liabilities	7,180		55,950		9,490		—			72,620
Liabilities of discontinued operations	—		5,470		—		—			5,470
Total current liabilities	7,180		157,490		36,500		(740		)	200,430
Long-term debt	245,770		227,270		—		—			473,040
Deferred income taxes	—		65,320		5,020		(2,550		)	67,790
Other long-term liabilities	—		49,330		4,880		—			54,210
Total liabilities	252,950		499,410		46,400		(3,290		)	795,470
Total shareholders' equity	162,390		407,670		129,600		(537,270		)	162,390
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	415,340	$	907,080	$	176,000	$	(540,560	)	$	957,860

Table of Contents

Supplemental Guarantor

Condensed Financial Statements

Consolidating Balance Sheet

(dollars in thousands)



	December 31, 2010
	Parent		Guarantor		Non- Guarantor		Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	15,070	$	31,300	$	—		$	46,370
Trade receivables, net	—		90,110		21,270		—			111,380
Receivables, intercompany	—		—		480		(480		)	—
Inventories	—		131,790		24,190		—			155,980
Deferred income taxes	13,210		19,740		1,550		—			34,500
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	10		5,300		1,360		—			6,670
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale	—		30,360		—		—			30,360
Total current assets	13,220		292,370		80,150		(480		)	385,260
Investments in subsidiaries	336,930		136,480		—		(473,410		)	—
Property and equipment, net	—		99,810		49,480		—			149,290
Goodwill	—		159,620		46,270		—			205,890
Intangibles and other assets	8,670		171,550		6,440		(2,940		)	183,720
Total assets	$	358,820	$	859,830	$	182,340	$	(476,830	)	$	924,160
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current maturities, long-term debt	$	—	$	17,730	$	—	$	—		$	17,730
Accounts payable, trade	—		97,530		26,860		—			124,390
Accounts payable, intercompany	—		480		—		(480		)	—
Accrued liabilities	1,080		55,320		10,200		—			66,600
Liabilities of discontinued operations	—		5,710		—		—			5,710
Total current liabilities	1,080		176,770		37,060		(480		)	214,430
Long-term debt	245,420		231,500		—		—			476,920
Deferred income taxes	—		62,810		4,010		(2,940		)	63,880
Other long-term liabilities	—		51,820		4,790		—			56,610
Total liabilities	246,500		522,900		45,860		(3,420		)	811,840
Total shareholders' equity	112,320		336,930		136,480		(473,410		)	112,320
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	358,820	$	859,830	$	182,340	$	(476,830	)	$	924,160

Table of Contents

Supplemental Guarantor

Condensed Financial Statements

Consolidating Statement of Operations

(dollars in thousands)



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	230,030		$	59,910		$	(12,280	)	$	277,660
Cost of sales	—			(164,480		)	(43,520		)	12,280			(195,720		)
Gross profit	—			65,550			16,390			—			81,940
Selling, general and administrative expenses	—			(39,080		)	(7,090		)	—			(46,170		)
Gain (loss) on dispositions of property and equipment	—			70			(50		)	—			20
Operating profit	—			26,540			9,250			—			35,790
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(6,420		)	(3,660		)	(650		)	—			(10,730		)
Other, net	—			(770		)	1,310			—			540
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net income of subsidiaries	(6,420		)	22,110			9,910			—			25,600
Income tax (expense) benefit	3,330			(9,030		)	(2,920		)	—			(8,620		)
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	21,360			6,990			—			(28,350		)	—
Income from continuing operations	18,270			20,070			6,990			(28,350		)	16,980
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—			1,290			—			—			1,290
Net income	$	18,270		$	21,360		$	6,990		$	(28,350	)	$	18,270



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	199,915		$	49,369		$	(11,554	)	$	237,730
Cost of sales	—			(141,065		)	(36,149		)	11,554			(165,660		)
Gross profit	—			58,850			13,220			—			72,070
Selling, general and administrative expenses	—			(33,790		)	(6,340		)	—			(40,130		)
Loss on dispositions of property and equipment	—			(210		)	—			—			(210		)
Operating profit	—			24,850			6,880			—			31,730
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(6,410		)	(5,710		)	(430		)	—			(12,550		)
Other, net	—			880			(1,080		)	—			(200		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net income of subsidiaries	(6,410		)	20,020			5,370			—			18,980
Income tax (expense) benefit	2,240			(7,810		)	(1,460		)	—			(7,030		)
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	16,890			3,910			—			(20,800		)	—
Income from continuing operations	12,720			16,120			3,910			(20,800		)	11,950
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—			770			—			—			770
Net income	$	12,720		$	16,890		$	3,910		$	(20,800	)	$	12,720

Table of Contents

Supplemental Guarantor

Condensed Financial Statements

Consolidating Statement of Operations

(dollars in thousands)



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	687,770		$	171,000		$	(34,460	)	$	824,310
Cost of sales	—			(490,760		)	(125,960		)	34,460			(582,260		)
Gross profit	—			197,010			45,040			—			242,050
Selling, general and administrative expenses	—			(114,890		)	(22,290		)	—			(137,180		)
Gain (loss) on dispositions of property and equipment	—			80			(30		)	—			50
Operating profit	—			82,200			22,720			—			104,920
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(19,250		)	(13,320		)	(1,800		)	—			(34,370		)
Debt extinguishment costs	—			(3,970		)	—			—			(3,970		)
Other, net	—			(5,180		)	4,010			—			(1,170		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net income of subsidiaries	(19,250		)	59,730			24,930			—			65,410
Income tax (expense) benefit	7,820			(21,510		)	(8,040		)	—			(21,730		)
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	58,540			16,890			—			(75,430		)	—
Income from continuing operations	47,110			55,110			16,890			(75,430		)	43,680
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—			3,430			—			—			3,430
Net income	$	47,110		$	58,540		$	16,890		$	(75,430	)	$	47,110

Table of Contents

Supplemental Guarantor

Condensed Financial Statements

Consolidating Statement of Operations

(dollars in thousands)



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	572,415		$	150,389		$	(32,854	)	$	689,950
Cost of sales	—			(406,905		)	(107,099		)	32,854			(481,150		)
Gross profit	—			165,510			43,290			—			208,800
Selling, general and administrative expenses	—			(100,120		)	(17,050		)	—			(117,170		)
Loss on dispositions of property and equipment	—			(680		)	(250		)	—			(930		)
Operating profit	—			64,710			25,990			—			90,700
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(19,290		)	(18,870		)	(1,620		)	—			(39,780		)
Gain on bargain purchase	—			410			—			—			410
Other, net	—			1,910			(3,140		)	—			(1,230		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net income of subsidiaries	(19,290		)	48,160			21,230			—			50,100
Income tax (expense) benefit	6,750			(19,820		)	(5,730		)	—			(18,800		)
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	52,120			15,500			—			(67,620		)	—
Income from continuing operations	39,580			43,840			15,500			(67,620		)	31,300
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—			8,280			—			—			8,280
Net income	$	39,580		$	52,120		$	15,500		$	(67,620	)	$	39,580

Table of Contents

Supplemental Guarantor

Condensed Financial Statements

Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

(dollars in thousands)



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations		Total
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities	$	(12,190	)	$	29,050		$	18,690		$	—	35,550
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	—			(14,950		)	(8,570		)	—		(23,520		)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	—			(27,200		)	(1,420		)	—		(28,620		)
Net proceeds from disposition of assets	—			2,190			50			—		2,240
Net cash used for investing activities	—			(39,960		)	(9,940		)	—		(49,900		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on term loan facilities	—			225,000			1,520			—		226,520
Repayments of borrowings on term loan facilities	—			(249,510		)	(660		)	—		(250,170		)
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facilities and accounts receivable facility	—			551,900			—			—		551,900
Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facilities and accounts receivable facility	—			(547,020		)	—			—		(547,020		)
Debt financing fees	—			(6,680		)						(6,680		)
Shares surrendered upon vesting of options and restricted stock awards to cover tax obligations	(830		)	—			—			—		(830		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	960			—			—			—		960
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation	—			3,840			—			—		3,840
Intercompany transfers (to) from subsidiaries	12,060			18,430			(30,490		)	—		—
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities	12,190			(4,040		)	(29,630		)	—		(21,480		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Decrease for the period	—			(14,950		)	(20,880		)	—		(35,830		)
At beginning of period	—			15,070			31,300			—		46,370
At end of period	$	—		$	120		$	10,420		$	—	$	10,540

Table of Contents

Supplemental Guarantor

Condensed Financial Statements

Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

(dollars in thousands)



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations		Total
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities	$	(12,630	)	$	42,470		$	31,760		$	—	61,600
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	—			(8,390		)	(2,700		)	—		(11,090		)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	—			(12,040		)	(720		)	—		(12,760		)
Net proceeds from disposition of assets	—			14,720			—			—		14,720
Net cash used for investing activities	—			(5,710		)	(3,420		)	—		(9,130		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Repayments of borrowings on term loan facilities	—			(1,950		)	(8,090		)	—		(10,040		)
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facilities and accounts receivable facility	—			372,840			3,590			—		376,430
Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facilities and accounts receivable facility	—			(378,000		)	(4,130		)	—		(382,130		)
Shares surrendered upon vesting of options and restricted stock awards to cover tax obligations	(240		)	—			—			—		(240		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	100			—			—			—		100
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation	—			440			—			—		440
Intercompany transfers (to) from subsidiaries	12,770			(15,080		)	2,310			—		—
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities	12,630			(21,750		)	(6,320		)	—		(15,440		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Increase for the period	—			15,010			22,020			—		37,030
At beginning of period	—			300			9,180			—		9,480
At end of period	$	—		$	15,310		$	31,200		$	—	$	46,510

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition contains forward-looking statements regarding industry outlook and our expectations regarding the performance of our business. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described under the heading "Forward Looking Statements," at the beginning of this report. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the Company's reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Introduction

We are an industrial manufacturer and distributor of highly engineered products serving focused markets in a diverse range of commercial, industrial and consumer applications. We have six reportable segments: Packaging, Energy, Aerospace & Defense, Engineered Components, Cequent Asia Pacific and Cequent North America.

Key Factors and Risks Affecting Our Reported Results. Our businesses and results of operations depend upon general economic conditions and we serve some customers in cyclical industries that are highly competitive and themselves significantly impacted by changes in economic conditions. Over the past few years, global economic conditions have cycled through some significant changes, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, in which worldwide credit markets and global economic conditions deteriorated significantly, resulting in declines in demand for our products and services. These conditions persisted throughout 2009, resulting in reductions in sales and earnings from comparable prior periods. We experienced generally higher levels of economic activity during 2010, as economic conditions continued to strengthen throughout the year, helping us to generate year-over-year increases in revenue and earnings in all of our reportable segments except Aerospace & Defense. The economic recovery has continued in 2011, and has been one of the main drivers of the continued increase in our sales and profitability levels.

Critical factors affecting our ability to succeed include: our ability to successfully pursue organic growth through product development, cross selling and extending product-line offerings, and our ability to quickly and cost-effectively introduce new products; our ability to acquire and integrate companies or products that will supplement existing product lines, add new distribution channels, expand our geographic coverage or enable us to better absorb overhead costs; our ability to manage our cost structure more efficiently through improved supply base management, internal sourcing and/or purchasing of materials, selective outsourcing and/or purchasing of support functions, working capital management, and greater leverage of our administrative and overhead functions. If we are unable to do any of the foregoing successfully, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.

There is some seasonality in the businesses within our Cequent reportable segments, primarily within Cequent North America, where sales of towing and trailering products are generally stronger in the second and third quarters, as trailer original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"), distributors and retailers acquire product for the spring and summer selling seasons. No other reportable segment experiences significant seasonal fluctuation in its businesses. We do not consider sales order backlog to be a material factor in our business. A growing portion of our sales may be derived from international sources, which exposes us to certain risks, including currency risks.

The demand for some of our products, particularly in our two Cequent reportable segments, is heavily influenced by consumer sentiment. We experienced decreases in sales and earnings in 2008 and 2009 as a result of an uncertain credit market and interest rate environment and rising energy costs, among other things. While we experienced local currency sales increases in both of our Cequent reportable segments in 2010 and the first nine months of 2011 compared to prior recessionary periods, we expect the current end market conditions may remain unstable, primarily for Cequent North America, given continued uncertainties in employment levels and consumer credit availability, both of which significantly impact consumer discretionary spending.

We are sensitive to price movements in our raw materials supply base. Our largest material purchases are for steel, copper, aluminum, polyethylene and other resins and energy. Historically, we have experienced increasing costs of steel and resin and have worked with our suppliers to manage cost pressures and disruptions in supply. We also utilize pricing programs to pass increased steel, copper, aluminum and resin costs to customers. Although we may experience delays in our ability to implement price increases, we have been generally able to recover such increased costs. We may experience disruptions in supply in the future and we may not be able to pass along higher costs associated with such disruptions to our customers in the form of price increases. We will continue to take actions as necessary to manage risks associated with increasing steel or other raw material costs. However, such increased costs may adversely impact our earnings.

We report shipping and handling expenses associated with our Cequent North America reportable segment's distribution network as an element of selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of operations. As such, gross margins for the Cequent North America reportable segment may not be comparable to other companies which include all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales.

Table of Contents

We have substantial debt, interest and lease payment requirements that may restrict our future operations and impair our ability to meet our obligations and, in a rising interest rate environment, our performance may be adversely affected by our degree of leverage.

Key Indicators of Performance. In evaluating our business, our management has historically considered Adjusted EBITDA as a key indicator of financial operating performance and as a measure of cash generating capability. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change, interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, debt extinguishment costs, non-cash asset and goodwill impairment charges and write-offs and non-cash losses on sale-leaseback of property and equipment. Management believed that consideration of Adjusted EBITDA, together with a careful review of our results reported under GAAP, was the best way to analyze our ability to service and/or incur indebtedness, as we have been a highly leveraged company. Thus, the use of Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure facilitated operating performance comparisons from period to period and company to company, as it excluded potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses), the impact of purchase accounting and depreciation and amortization expense. Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitated internal comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more consistent basis, we have also used Adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes, in measuring our performance relative to that of our competitors and in evaluating acquisition opportunities. In addition, we believe Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are widely used by investors, securities analysts, ratings agencies and other interested parties as a measure of financial performance and debt-service capabilities.

In light of the significant changes in our business over the past few years, including changes in our senior leadership (new CFO in 2008 and CEO in 2009) as well as the structural and operating changes in our businesses, we believe we are a more competitive company, with a lower fixed cost structure and more focused on productivity and other lean initiatives to drive future profitability and cash flows. We have generated significant cash from operations during the last two years, which has enabled us to reduce our debt levels. Given these changes, and the resulting improvement in earnings quality, management believes we are evolving from a highly leveraged company that, for comparative purposes, relied on Adjusted EBITDA as a key indicator of performance, to one that can rely and report on GAAP-based results. As the Company continues to grow its earnings base and decrease its debt levels, investors and analysts are placing TriMas in comparable company groupings that rely primarily on GAAP-based metrics for valuation and presentation purposes. Thus, while Adjusted EBITDA remains an important indicator of performance, by the end of 2011, we intend to rely on the GAAP-based metrics of operating profit and cash flow from operations as they relate to our key metrics of earnings and liquidity, respectively.

Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:


•	it does not reflect our cash expenditures for capital equipment or other contractual commitments;


•	although depreciation, amortization and asset impairment charges and write-offs are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated, amortized or written off may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements;


•	it does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;


•	it does not reflect the significant interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our indebtedness;


•	it does not reflect certain tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;


•	it includes amounts resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of underlying performance of our fundamental business operations; and


•	other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these measures differently and as the number of differences in the way two different companies calculate these measures increases, the degree of their usefulness as a comparative measure correspondingly decreases.

Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in our growth. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. We carefully review our operating profit margins (operating profit as a percentage of net sales) at a reportable segment level, which are discussed in detail in our year-to-year comparison of operating results.

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of our net income to Adjusted EBITDA and cash flows used for operating activities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Net income	$	18,270		$	12,720		$	47,110		$	39,580
Income tax expense	9,380			7,450			23,750			23,580
Interest expense	10,730			12,680			34,370			40,200
Depreciation and amortization	10,280			9,220			29,940			28,270
Debt extinguishment costs	—			—			3,970			—
Adjusted EBITDA, total company	$	48,660		$	42,070		$	139,140		$	131,630
Cash paid for interest	(2,640		)	(5,710		)	(25,350		)	(27,710		)
Cash paid for taxes	(3,000		)	(2,990		)	(12,140		)	(6,260		)
(Gain) loss on dispositions of property and equipment	(10		)	230			(30		)	(9,080		)
Gain on bargain purchase	—			—			—			(410		)
Non-cash compensation expense	920			290			2,580			1,050
Net change in working capital	(3,720		)	(3,710		)	(68,650		)	(27,620		)
Cash flows provided by operating activities	$	40,210		$	30,180		$	35,550		$	61,600

Table of Contents

Segment Information and Supplemental Analysis

The following table summarizes financial information for our six current reportable segments for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:



	Three months ended September 30,
	2011			As a Percentage of Net Sales		2010			As a Percentage of Net Sales
	(dollars in thousands)
Net Sales
Packaging	$	46,090		16.6	%	$	44,490		18.7	%
Energy	42,690			15.4	%	31,710			13.3	%
Aerospace & Defense	20,330			7.3	%	19,170			8.1	%
Engineered Components	46,010			16.6	%	30,530			12.8	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	26,020			9.4	%	18,280			7.7	%
Cequent North America	96,520			34.8	%	93,550			39.4	%
Total	$	277,660		100.0	%	$	237,730		100.0	%
Gross Profit
Packaging	$	17,150		37.2	%	$	18,250		41.0	%
Energy	11,000			25.8	%	8,920			28.1	%
Aerospace & Defense	8,320			40.9	%	6,750			35.2	%
Engineered Components	10,910			23.7	%	6,060			19.8	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	7,880			30.3	%	4,650			25.4	%
Cequent North America	26,680			27.6	%	27,440			29.3	%
Total	$	81,940		29.5	%	$	72,070		30.3	%
Selling, General and Administrative
Packaging	$	6,890		14.9	%	$	5,010		11.3	%
Energy	6,450			15.1	%	5,820			18.4	%
Aerospace & Defense	2,890			14.2	%	1,390			7.3	%
Engineered Components	3,240			7.0	%	2,740			9.0	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	2,590			10.0	%	2,210			12.1	%
Cequent North America	17,120			17.7	%	16,450			17.6	%
Corporate expenses	6,990			N/A		6,510			N/A
Total	$	46,170		16.6	%	$	40,130		16.9	%
Operating Profit (Loss)
Packaging	$	10,240		22.2	%	$	13,140		29.5	%
Energy	4,560			10.7	%	3,100			9.8	%
Aerospace & Defense	5,420			26.7	%	5,350			27.9	%
Engineered Components	7,730			16.8	%	3,220			10.5	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	5,250			20.2	%	2,430			13.3	%
Cequent North America	9,580			9.9	%	11,000			11.8	%
Corporate expenses	(6,990		)	N/A		(6,510		)	N/A
Total	$	35,790		12.9	%	$	31,730		13.3	%
Adjusted EBITDA
Packaging	$	13,950		30.3	%	$	16,010		36.0	%
Energy	5,010			11.7	%	3,540			11.2	%
Aerospace & Defense	6,140			30.2	%	5,770			30.1	%
Engineered Components	8,570			18.6	%	4,010			13.1	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	6,240			24.0	%	3,240			17.7	%
Cequent North America	12,310			12.8	%	14,080			15.1	%
Corporate expenses	(6,150		)	N/A		(6,450		)	N/A
Subtotal from continuing operations	46,070			16.6	%	40,200			16.9	%
Discontinued operations	2,590			N/A		1,870			N/A
Total company	$	48,660		17.5	%	$	42,070		17.7	%

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes financial information for our six current reportable segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:



	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			As a Percentage of Net Sales		2010			As a Percentage of Net Sales
	(dollars in thousands)
Net Sales
Packaging	$	137,890		16.7	%	$	133,610		19.4	%
Energy	125,810			15.3	%	94,400			13.7	%
Aerospace & Defense	60,160			7.3	%	53,470			7.7	%
Engineered Components	126,870			15.4	%	77,810			11.3	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	67,390			8.2	%	57,040			8.3	%
Cequent North America	306,190			37.1	%	273,620			39.7	%
Total	$	824,310		100.0	%	$	689,950		100.0	%
Gross Profit
Packaging	$	56,340		40.9	%	$	54,050		40.5	%
Energy	34,140			27.1	%	27,150			28.8	%
Aerospace & Defense	22,710			37.7	%	20,030			37.5	%
Engineered Components	27,400			21.6	%	15,630			20.1	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	17,770			26.4	%	15,410			27.0	%
Cequent North America	83,690			27.3	%	76,530			28.0	%
Total	$	242,050		29.4	%	$	208,800		30.3	%
Selling, General and Administrative
Packaging	$	19,170		13.9	%	$	14,880		11.1	%
Energy	19,230			15.3	%	15,740			16.7	%
Aerospace & Defense	8,650			14.4	%	7,000			13.1	%
Engineered Components	8,550			6.7	%	6,900			8.9	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	8,040			11.9	%	5,960			10.4	%
Cequent North America	53,040			17.3	%	48,300			17.7	%
Corporate expenses	20,500			N/A		18,390			N/A
Total	$	137,180		16.6	%	$	117,170		17.0	%
Operating Profit (Loss)
Packaging	$	37,140		26.9	%	$	38,480		28.8	%
Energy	14,920			11.9	%	11,360			12.0	%
Aerospace & Defense	14,000			23.3	%	13,020			24.4	%
Engineered Components	19,010			15.0	%	8,630			11.1	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	9,720			14.4	%	9,420			16.5	%
Cequent North America	30,630			10.0	%	28,180			10.3	%
Corporate expenses	(20,500		)	N/A		(18,390		)	N/A
Total	$	104,920		12.7	%	$	90,700		13.1	%
Adjusted EBITDA
Packaging	$	47,090		34.2	%	$	47,350		35.4	%
Energy	15,740			12.5	%	12,640			13.4	%
Aerospace & Defense	16,000			26.6	%	14,780			27.6	%
Engineered Components	21,640			17.1	%	10,940			14.1	%
Cequent Asia Pacific	12,160			18.0	%	11,480			20.1	%
Cequent North America	39,100			12.8	%	37,810			13.8	%
Corporate expenses	(19,710		)	N/A		(18,390		)	N/A
Subtotal from continuing operations	132,020			16.0	%	116,610			16.9	%
Discontinued operations	7,120			N/A		15,020			N/A
Total company	$	139,140		16.9	%	$	131,630		19.1	%

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The principal factors impacting us during the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2010, were:


•	the impact of the continued upturn in economic conditions in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, contributing to increased net sales in all six of our reportable segments;


•	market share gains and new product introductions in the third quarter of 2011, primarily within our Engineered Components, Energy and Cequent North America reportable segments;


•	the impact of our South Texas Bolt & Fitting and Innovative Molding acquisitions in our Energy and Packaging reportable segments, respectively;


•	the favorable impact of currency exchange, as our reported results were favorably impacted by stronger foreign currencies, primarily in our Packaging and Cequent Asia Pacific reportable segments; and


•	a mix shift of the gross and operating profit generated by and within our reportable segments, slightly lowering total Company margins as a result of the significant growth in our Energy and Engineered Components reportable segments compared to the quarter-over-quarter change in margins in the other reportable segments.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared with Three Months Ended September 30, 2010

Overall, net sales increased approximately $39.9 million, or approximately 16.8%, to $277.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared with $237.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. During the third quarter of 2011, net sales increased in each of our six reportable segments. Of the sales increase, approximately $6.2 million was due to our Innovative Molding acquisition in our Packaging reportable segment in the third quarter of 2011 and $5.7 million was due to our South Texas Bolt & Fitting acquisition in our Energy reportable segment in the fourth quarter of 2010. In addition, net sales were favorably impacted by approximately $4.9 million as a result of currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted by stronger foreign currencies, primarily in our Packaging and Cequent Asia Pacific reportable segments. The remainder of the increase in sales levels between years was due to the upturn in the economic conditions compared to the third quarter of 2010, generally aiding sales in all of our reportable segments, our continued market share gains, primarily in the Energy, Engineered Components and Cequent North America reportable segments, our expansion in international markets, primarily in our Energy and Cequent Asia Pacific reportable segments and our new product introductions and related growth, primarily in our Engineered Components reportable segment.

Gross profit margin (gross profit as a percentage of sales) approximated 29.5% and 30.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Gross profit was favorably impacted by approximately $1.7 million as a result of currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted by stronger foreign currencies. The decrease in profit margin is attributed primarily to a mix shift, as our two lowest gross profit margin reportable segments, Energy and Engineered Components, encompassed a greater percentage of total Company sales following their significant increases in sales in the third quarter of 2011 over third quarter 2010. In addition, our third quarter 2011 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by purchase accounting adjustments related to step-up in value and subsequent amortization of inventory and intangible assets and planned costs incurred and manufacturing inefficiencies related to the move to a new manufacturing facility for our Innovative Molding acquisition. While we continue to generate significant savings from capital investments, productivity projects and lean initiatives, particularly in our Packaging and Engineered Components reportable segments, the savings from those projects has primarily been offset by economic cost increases and our investment in growth initiatives, as our gross profit margins, particularly in our Energy reportable segment, are lower when we open facilities in new geographies and aggressively price these products to gain market penetration plus don't gain the operating leverage on our fixed costs until projected sales volumes are achieved in the future.

Operating profit margin (operating profit as a percentage of sales) approximated 12.9% and 13.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Operating profit increased approximately $4.1 million, or 12.8%, to $35.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $31.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of the higher sales levels. Operating profit was also favorably impacted by approximately $1.0 million as a result of currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted by stronger foreign currencies. Our operating margins declined, primarily due to the sales mix shift between our reportable segments, with our lower margin reportable segments comprising a larger percentage of total sales, which more than offset the 30 basis point improvement in total Company selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales.

Table of Contents

Interest expense decreased approximately $1.8 million, to $10.7 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $12.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in interest expense was primarily the result of a decrease in our effective weighted average interest rate on variable rate U.S. borrowings, including our accounts receivable facility, to approximately 4.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from 5.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2010. During the third quarter of 2010, we recorded approximately $0.6 million of interest expense related to changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps. There were no amounts incurred during the third quarter of 2011 as the swap agreements had expired. Partially offsetting these reductions in interest expense was an increase in our weighted-average U.S. Credit Facility and accounts receivable facility borrowings to approximately $300.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, from approximately $272.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of funding our Innovative Molding acquisition and higher capital expenditures in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010.

Other expense, net decreased approximately $0.7 million due to higher gains in transactions denominated in foreign currencies for the three months ended September 30, 2011 than during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

The effective income tax rates for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were 33.7% and 37.0%, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded the favorable impact of certain tax credits that we now expect to realize and benefited from an overall lower foreign effective tax rate than for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Net income from continuing operations increased by $5.0 million to $17.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $12.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 primarily as a result of higher sales levels year-over-year, which helped to generate $4.1 million increased operating profit. The $4.1 million increase in operating profit, plus the $1.8 million reduction in interest expense, primarily due to lower weighted-average interest rates on U.S. variable-rate borrowings, plus the $0.7 million higher gains on transactions denominated in foreign currencies, less the $1.6 million increase in income taxes, primarily related to the higher earnings in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, all resulted in the increase in net income in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010.

Adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations (Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of sales) approximated 16.6% and 16.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations increased approximately $5.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the change in operating profit between years after consideration of approximately $1.0 million higher depreciation and amortization expense and $0.7 million higher gains on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010.

See below for a discussion of operating results by segment.

Packaging. Net sales increased approximately $1.6 million, or 3.6%, to $46.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $44.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Sales increased approximately $6.2 million as a result of the acquisition of Innovative Molding in August 2011. In addition, sales increased by approximately $1.3 million due to favorable currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted as a result of the weaker U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies. Sales of our industrial closures, rings and levers decreased by approximately $4.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010, and sales of our specialty systems products decreased by approximately $1.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010, with decreases in both categories primarily due to customer actions to actively manage down inventory levels in response to the current economic softness and uncertain end-market demand. In addition, specialty systems decreased as a result of fewer promotional programs launched in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010.

Packaging's gross profit decreased approximately $1.1 million to $17.2 million, or 37.2% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $18.3 million, or 41.0% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Although the acquisition of Innovative Molding added approximately $6.2 million of sales in the quarter, it only contributed approximately $0.4 million of gross profit, with the low margin primarily due to purchase accounting adjustments related to step-up in value and subsequent amortization of inventory and intangible assets and planned costs incurred and manufacturing inefficiencies related to the move to a new manufacturing facility. The inclusion of Innovative Molding's results of operations, including the purchase accounting and move costs, drove a 480 basis point drop in gross profit margin for this segment. After consideration of changes in gross profit related to the Innovative Molding acquisition, gross profit margins on the legacy business increased 100 basis points despite the reduction in sales levels, as the savings and efficiencies generated by our continued capital investments, productivity projects and lean initiatives within this segment more than offset the lower fixed cost absorption associated with the lower industrial and specialty product sales levels as well as higher material costs incurred in the third quarter of 2011.

Packaging's selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $1.9 million to $6.9 million, or 14.9% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $5.0 million, or 11.3% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase is primarily related to the incremental operating costs for Innovative Molding in addition to incremental travel, legal, finance and other diligence costs associated with consummating the deal. In addition, we have increased our sales-related and technical resources in recent months in support our sales growth initiatives.

Table of Contents

Packaging's operating profit decreased approximately $2.9 million to $10.2 million, or 22.2% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $13.1 million, or 29.5% of sales, in three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the purchase accounting, move-related and incremental selling, general and administrative costs associated with the acquisition of Innovative Molding. In addition, operating profit decreased within our legacy business due to declines in sales levels between years, higher material costs and higher selling expenses related to our sales growth efforts, which were partially offset by our continued capital, productivity and lean initiatives which continue to generate operating savings.

Packaging's Adjusted EBITDA decreased approximately $2.1 million to $14.0 million, or 30.3% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $16.0 million, or 36.0% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the change in operating profit between years after consideration of $0.3 million higher depreciation and amortization expense in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010 and $0.2 million of gains on transactions denominated in foreign currencies incurred in the third quarter of 2011 that didn't occur in the third quarter of 2010.

Energy. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $11.0 million, or 34.6%, to $42.7 million, as compared to $31.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Of this increase, approximately $5.7 million is due to the acquisition of the legacy South Texas Bolt & Fitting business in the fourth quarter of 2010, and approximately $2.0 million is due to an increase in our market share of bolts, as certain existing customers continue to award us additional business due to our enhanced specialty bolt manufacturing capabilities as a result of the South Texas Bolt acquisition. In addition, we generated approximately $1.2 million in incremental sales from our new Midland, MI, Salt Lake City, UT, Edmonton, Canada and Grimsby, UK branch facilities. The remainder of the increase is primarily due to increased levels of turn-around activity at refineries and petrochemical plants and increased sales demand from the chemical industry, as customers continue to perform maintenance work and new programs deferred from 2010 that require our replacement and specialty gaskets and bolts.

Gross profit within Energy increased approximately $2.1 million to $11.0 million, or 25.8% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $8.9 million, or 28.1% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Gross profit margins declined year-over-year mainly due to a less favorable sales mix, as standard gaskets and bolts, which return lower margins than highly-engineered gaskets and bolts, comprised a larger percentage of net sales in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010. In addition, as this segment continues to add new branch locations to grow its sales base, we have experienced a sales mix shift. Our new branch sales, which have lower margins due to aggressively pricing products to penetrate new markets in addition to incurring launch costs, including employee training of manufacturing processes, encompass a larger percentage of the total sales in the third quarter of 2011 than in the third quarter of 2010.

Selling, general and administrative expenses within Energy increased approximately $0.6 million to $6.5 million, or 15.1% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $5.8 million, or 18.4% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, as selling, general and administrative expenses increased in support of our branch facility growth initiatives. However, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales due to the continued fixed cost reductions implemented throughout 2010 and 2011 and operating leverage gained on the higher sales levels.

Overall, operating profit within Energy increased approximately $1.5 million to $4.6 million, or 10.7% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $3.1 million, or 9.8% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, due principally to the leverage gained by higher sales levels, which was partially offset by a less favorable product mix, continued increases in sales in our new branches, which typically have lower margins as they penetrate new markets, and higher selling, general and administrative expenses in support of our growth initiatives.

Energy's Adjusted EBITDA increased $1.5 million to $5.0 million, or 11.7% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $3.5 million, or 11.2% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the increase in operating profit between years.

Aerospace & Defense. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $1.2 million, or 6.1%, to $20.3 million, as compared to $19.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Sales in our aerospace business increased approximately $5.0 million, primarily due to higher sales levels in our blind bolt and temporary fastener product lines to our distribution customers, continuing the trend that began in the third quarter of 2010 of higher order activity in the aerospace bolt and fastener supply chain. Sales in our defense business decreased approximately $3.8 million, primarily due to decreased activity associated with managing the relocation to and establishment of the new defense facility.

Gross profit within Aerospace & Defense increased approximately $1.6 million to $8.3 million, or 40.9% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $6.8 million, or 35.2% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due the increase in sales levels in the aerospace business and a more favorable product sales mix, as the more profitable aerospace business comprised a larger percentage of the gross profit in the third quarter of 2011 than in the third quarter of 2010.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $1.5 million to $2.9 million, or 14.2% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $1.4 million, or 7.3% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to higher costs in the aerospace business for commissions and other costs incurred in support of our growth initiatives and higher legal fee costs within our defense business.

Table of Contents

Operating profit within Aerospace & Defense remained essentially flat at $5.4 million, or 26.7% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $5.4 million, or 27.9% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, as the increase in gross profit due to the higher sales levels between years and more favorable product sales mix in the third quarter of 2011 more than offset the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Aerospace & Defense's Adjusted EBITDA increased approximately $0.4 million to $6.1 million, or 30.2% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $5.8 million, or 30.1% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the increase in operating profit between years after consideration of $0.3 million higher depreciation expense in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010.

Engineered Components. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $15.5 million, or 50.7%, to $46.0 million, as compared to $30.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Sales in our industrial cylinder business increased by approximately $8.2 million. Of this increase, approximately $3.2 million was due to market share gains, primarily of large high pressure cylinders to existing customers. The remainder of the increase was primarily due to the continued upturn in economic conditions. Sales of slow speed and compressor engines and related products increased by approximately $7.3 million, as sales of engines and engine parts increased approximately $4.3 million due to increased drilling activity as compared to the third quarter of 2010. Sales of gas compression products and processing and meter run equipment increased by approximately $3.0 million, as we continue to introduce new products to add to our well-site content.

Gross profit within Engineered Components increased approximately $4.9 million to $10.9 million, or 23.7% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $6.1 million, or 19.8% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Gross profit increased approximately $3.1 million as a result of the higher sales levels. In addition, both our industrial cylinder and engine businesses significantly increased their gross profit margins compared to the third quarter of 2010. Our industrial cylinder business experienced a more favorable product sales mix, as the growth in sales was mainly in large high pressure cylinders, which have a higher margin than small high pressure cylinders. In addition, this business continues to generate incremental savings and cost reductions from productivity projects related to the asset acquisition from Taylor Wharton in the second quarter of 2010. Our engine business continues to benefit from significant operating leverage, as their sales increased without significant additional fixed cost requirements. In addition, while the engine business experienced a less favorable sales mix in the third quarter of 2011 due to a higher percentage of sales related to lower margin engines than higher margin engines, parts and compression parts, this margin was more than made up by material cost reduction projects and improved productivity as a result of new process automation.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.5 million to $3.2 million, or 7.0% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $2.7 million, or 9.0% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of increased sales and promotional spending in support of our sales growth projects. However, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales due to the continued fixed cost reductions implemented throughout 2010 and 2011 and operating leverage gained on the higher sales levels.

Operating profit within Engineered Components increased $4.5 million to approximately $7.7 million, or 16.8% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to operating profit of $3.2 million, or 10.5% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the higher sales levels between years, higher operating leverage and productivity projects, which were partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses in support of our sales growth initiatives.

Engineered Components' Adjusted EBITDA increased $4.6 million to $8.6 million, or 18.6% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $4.0 million, or 13.1% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the increase in operating profit between years.

Cequent Asia Pacific. Net sales increased approximately $7.7 million, or 42.3%, to $26.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $18.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Net sales were favorably impacted by approximately $3.4 million of currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted as a result of the weaker U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies. Excluding the impact of currency exchange, sales increased approximately $4.3 million, primarily due to new original equipment customer program business awards.

Cequent Asia Pacific's gross profit increased approximately $3.2 million to $7.9 million, or 30.3% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, from approximately $4.7 million, or 25.4% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Gross profit was favorably impacted by approximately $1.1 million of currency exchange. Excluding the impact of currency exchange, gross profit increased by approximately $2.1 million, with $1.1 million as a result of the higher sales levels between years. The remaining increase in gross profit was primarily as a result of a third quarter 2011 agreement with a customer to reimburse us for start-up costs we previously incurred for a new program and recorded as cost of sales, primarily in the second quarter of 2011.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.4 million to $2.6 million, or 10.0% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $2.2 million, or 12.1% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of currency exchange, as local currency spending levels were consistent year-over-year.

Table of Contents

Cequent Asia Pacific's operating profit increased approximately $2.8 million to approximately $5.3 million, or 20.2% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $2.4 million, or 13.3% of net sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Operating profit was favorably impacted by approximately $0.7 million of currency exchange. Excluding the impact of currency exchange, operating profit increased by $2.1 million, primarily as a result of the higher sales levels between years and the agreement with a customer to reimburse us for start-up costs previously expensed.

Cequent Asia Pacific's Adjusted EBITDA increased approximately $3.0 million to $6.2 million, or 24.0% of sales, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $3.2 million, or 17.7% of sales, for the three months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the increase in operating profit between years after consideration of $0.2 million of additional depreciation expense in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010.

Cequent North America. Net sales increased approximately $3.0 million, or 3.2% to $96.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $93.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to year-over-year increases within our retail and industrial channels. Sales in our retail channel increased approximately $1.2 million in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, primarily due to sales to new customers. Sales within our industrial channel increased approximately $2.5 million in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, primarily due to new customer gains. Partially offsetting these increases in retail and industrial sales was a reduction in sales to international customers of approximately $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, primarily due to cautious purchasing by our European customers managing their inventory levels in light of the economic uncertainties.

Cequent North America's gross profit decreased approximately $0.8 million to $26.7 million, or 27.6% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, from approximately $27.4 million, or 29.3% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. While we continue to generate additional gross profit via productivity and alternate sourcing initiatives, and via incremental sales as we continue to gain market share and generate new customer wins, the gross profit from higher sales and the savings generated by these productivity initiatives were more than offset by reductions in gross profit due to higher steel and freight costs in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010, as management elected to delay certain additional sales price increases to its customers in response to continued higher steel, copper and freight costs until the fourth quarter of 2011 in order to to continue to generate market share gains, primarily in the aftermarket and industrial channels.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.7 million to $17.1 million, or 17.7% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $16.5 million, or 17.6% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of new sales promotions, advertising and other costs that support our sales growth initiatives and higher sales levels in the third quarter of 2011.

Cequent North America's operating profit decreased approximately $1.4 million to $9.6 million, or 9.9% of sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $11.0 million, or 11.8% of net sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to reduced gross profit due to higher steel and freight costs, as well as higher selling, general and administrative expenses in support of the higher sales levels and our sales growth initiatives.

Cequent North America's Adjusted EBITDA decreased approximately $1.8 million to $12.3 million, or 12.8% of sales, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $14.1 million, or 15.1% of sales, for the three months ended September 30, 2010. After consideration of approximately $0.1 million of lower depreciation and amortization expense in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2010, and $0.1 million higher losses on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the three months ended September 30, 2011 than the three months ended September 30, 2010, the change in Adjusted EBITDA is consistent with the decrease in operating profit between years.

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses included in operating profit and Adjusted EBITDA consist of the following:



	Three months ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(in millions)
Corporate operating expenses	$	3.3		$	3.0
Employee costs and related benefits	3.7			3.5
Corporate expenses—operating profit	$	7.0		$	6.5
Other, net	$	(0.8	)	$	—
Corporate expenses—Adjusted EBITDA	$	6.2		$	6.5

Table of Contents

Corporate expenses included in operating profit increased approximately $0.5 million to $7.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $6.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase between years is primarily attributed to an increase in third party professional fees, primarily supporting our international growth efforts, and higher employee costs and related benefits, primarily incurred due to increasing our support staff to bring certain competencies, primarily in tax and legal-related functions, in-house rather than outsourcing. Other expense, net decreased by $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to increased gains on transactions denominated in foreign currencies between years.

Discontinued Operations. The results of discontinued operations consist of our precision tool cutting and specialty fitting lines of business, which we committed to a plan to exit the businesses in the third quarter of 2011, our medical device line of business, which was sold in May 2010, and our property management line of business, which was sold in April 2010. Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. See Note 2, "Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale," to our consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report on Form 10-Q.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

Overall, net sales increased approximately $134.4 million, or approximately 19.5%, to $824.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared with $690.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the first nine months of 2011, net sales increased in each of our six reportable segments. Of the sales increase, approximately $30.0 million was due to our South Texas Bolt & Fitting,Taylor-Wharton and Innovative Molding acquisitions. In addition, net sales were favorably impacted by approximately $14.0 million as a result of currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted by stronger foreign currencies, primarily in Australia. The remainder of the increase in sales levels between years was due to the upturn in the economic conditions compared to the first nine months of 2010, generally aiding sales in all of our reportable segments, our continued market share gains, primarily in the Engineered Components, Energy and Cequent North America reportable segments, our expansion into new markets, primarily in our Energy and Cequent Asia Pacific reportable segments and our new product introductions and related growth, primarily in our Engineered Components reportable segments.

Gross profit margin (gross profit as a percentage of sales) approximated 29.4% and 30.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in profit margin is attributed primarily to a mix shift, as the reportable segments with lower gross profit margins, Engineered Components and Energy, encompassed a greater percentage of total Company sales following their significant increases in sales in the first nine months of 2011 over the first nine months of 2010 compared to the other reportable segments. While we continue to generate significant savings from capital investments, productivity projects and lean initiatives, the savings from those projects has primarily been offset by economic cost increases and our investment in growth initiatives, as our gross profit margins, particularly in our Energy reportable segment, are lower when we open facilities in new geographies and aggressively price these products to gain market penetration plus don't gain the operating leverage on our fixed costs until projected sales volumes are achieved in the future.

Operating profit margin (operating profit as a percentage of sales) approximated 12.7% and 13.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Operating profit increased approximately $14.2 million, or 15.7%, to $104.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $90.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of the higher sales levels. Our operating margins declined, primarily due to the unfavorable sales mix shift between our reportable segments, with our lower margin reportable segments comprising a larger percentage of total Company sales, which more than offset the 40 basis point improvement in total Company selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales.

Interest expense decreased approximately $5.4 million, to $34.4 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $39.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The primary reason for the decline in interest expense is related to interest expense recorded for changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps, for which we recorded approximately $0.4 million of interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $3.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. In addition, we recognized a decrease in interest expense due to a decrease in our effective weighted average interest rate on credit agreement and accounts receivable facility borrowings to approximately 4.8%, from 5.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Partially offsetting these reductions was an increase in our weighted-average Credit Facility and accounts receivable facility borrowings to approximately $296.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from approximately $287.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Debt extinguishment costs of approximately $4.0 million were incurred related to the refinance of our U.S. bank debt in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. No such costs were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized an approximate $0.4 million gain on a bargain purchase associated with the asset acquisition in our industrial cylinder business. There was no bargain purchase during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Table of Contents

Other expense, net remained relatively flat at $1.2 million for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we incurred approximately $1.0 million of expense attributable to a reduction of an indemnification asset related to uncertain tax positions. This increase in expense was offset by an approximately $1.0 million change in gains and losses in transactions denominated in foreign currencies, as we realized $0.1 million of gains on such transactions in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, while recorded losses of $0.9 million on such transactions in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 33.2% and 37.5%, respectively. During the first nine months of 2011, the Company recorded a net tax benefit of approximately $1.0 million primarily related to a change in an uncertain tax position reserve for which the statute of limitations expired, as well as certain tax credits that the Company now expects to realize. During the first nine months of 2010, the Company recorded a tax charge of approximately $1.4 million related to certain Subpart F exceptions under U.S. tax legislation that had expired in the first quarter of 2010.

Net income from continuing operations increased by $12.4 million to $43.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $31.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily as a result of higher sales levels year-over-year, which helped to generate $14.2 million increased operating profit. The $14.2 million increase in operating profit, plus the $5.4 million reduction in interest expense, primarily due to less interest expense recorded on changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps, less the $4.0 million charge in the first nine months of 2011 for debt extinguishment costs incurred in connection with our U.S. bank debt refinancing, less the $0.4 million bargain purchase gain on the industrial cylinder business acquisition in the first nine months of 2010, less the $2.9 million increase in income taxes, primarily related to higher income levels in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, all resulted in the increase in net income in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010.

Adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations (Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of sales) approximated 16.0% and 16.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations increased approximately $15.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. After consideration of the $1.0 million of expense attributable to a reduction of an indemnification asset related to uncertain tax positions in the first nine months of 2011, the $0.4 million gain on bargain purchase related to the asset acquisition in our industrial cylinder business in the first half of 2010, the $0.1 million gains on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the first nine months of 2011 compared to $0.9 million of losses on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the first nine months of 2010 and $1.5 million higher depreciation and amortization expense in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, the change in Adjusted EBITDA is consistent with the change in operating profit between years.

See below for a discussion of operating results by segment.

Packaging. Net sales increased approximately $4.3 million, or 3.2%, to $137.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $133.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Sales increased approximately $6.2 million as a result of the acquisition of Innovative Molding in August 2011. In addition, sales increased by approximately $3.8 million due to favorable currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted as a result of the weaker U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies. Sales of our industrial closures, rings and levers increased by approximately $2.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of market share gains and the general economic recovery in 2011, primarily in the first half of 2011. Sales of our specialty dispensing products decreased approximately $8.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to approximately $4.9 million of swine flu-related product sales during the pandemic in 2010 and a pipeline fill of new product introductions at two significant personal care customers in 2010, both of which did not recur in the first nine months of 2011.

Packaging's gross profit increased approximately $2.3 million to $56.3 million, or 40.9% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $54.1 million, or 40.5% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Although the acquisition of Innovative Molding added approximately $6.2 million of sales in 2011, it only contributed approximately $0.4 million of gross profit, with the low margin primarily due to purchase accounting adjustments related to step-up in value and subsequent amortization of inventory and intangible assets and related to planned costs incurred and manufacturing inefficiencies related to the move to a new manufacturing facility. The inclusion of Innovative Molding's results of operations, including the purchase accounting and move costs, drove a 160 basis point drop in gross profit margin for this segment. After consideration of changes in gross profit related to the Innovative Molding acquisition, gross profit increased $1.9 million, primarily driven by favorable currency exchange of $1.8 million. This segment was able to hold gross profit dollars essentially flat in its legacy business despite a $5.7 million reduction in legacy sales levels after consideration of currency exchange, equating to almost a 200 basis point improvement in gross profit margins. This margin improvement was due to the continued savings and efficiencies generated by our continued capital investments, productivity projects and lean initiatives.

Table of Contents

Packaging's selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $4.3 million to $19.2 million, or 13.9% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $14.9 million, or 11.1% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase is attributable to the increase in sales-related and technical resources, travel costs and sales promotions, all of which support our sales growth initiatives, and due to the incremental operating, diligence and other transaction costs associated with Innovative Molding.

Packaging's operating profit decreased $1.3 million to $37.1 million, or 26.9% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $38.5 million, or 28.8% of sales, in nine months ended September 30, 2010, as the increases in gross profit generated via the capital, productivity and lean projects and favorable currency exchange were more than offset by the operating profit losses associated with lower legacy business sales levels increases, higher spending levels within selling, general and administrative expenses in support of our growth initiatives, and costs incurred associated with the acquisition of Innovative Molding. In addition, this segment recorded losses on dispositions of fixed assets of $0.7 million in the first nine months of 2010 that did not recur in the first nine months of 2011.

Packaging's Adjusted EBITDA decreased approximately $0.3 million to $47.1 million, or 34.2% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $47.4 million, or 35.4% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the change in operating profit between years after consideration of $0.5 million of losses on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the first nine months of 2010 compared to $0.1 million of gains on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the first nine months of 2011, and $0.2 million lower depreciation expense in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010.

Energy. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $31.4 million, or 33.3%, to $125.8 million, as compared to $94.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Of this increase, approximately $15.6 million is due to the acquisition of South Texas Bolt & Fitting in the fourth quarter of 2010, and approximately $5.5 million is due to an increase in our market share of bolts, as certain existing customers have awarded us additional business due to our enhanced specialty bolt manufacturing capabilities as a result of the South Texas Bolt acquisition. In addition, approximately $3.3 million resulted from incremental sales generated by our new Midland, MI, Salt Lake City, UT, Edmonton, Canada and Grimsby, UK branch facilities. Sales also increased by approximately $0.8 million due to favorable currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted as a result of the weaker U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies. The remainder of the increase is primarily due to increased levels of turn-around activity at refineries and petrochemical plants and increased sales demand from the chemical industry, as customers have begun to perform maintenance work and new programs deferred from 2010 that require our replacement and specialty gaskets and bolts.

Gross profit within Energy increased approximately $7.0 million to $34.1 million, or 27.1% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $27.2 million, or 28.8% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Gross profit margins declined year-over-year mainly due to a sales mix shift. Our new branch sales, which have lower margins due to aggressively pricing products to penetrate new markets in addition to incurring launch costs, including employee training of manufacturing processes, encompass a larger percentage of the total sales in the first nine months of 2011 than in the first nine months of 2010. In addition, this segment experienced a less favorable product sales mix in the first nine months of 2011 than in the first nine months of 2010, as standard gaskets and bolts, which return lower margins than highly-engineered gaskets and bolts, comprised a larger percentage of net sales. Also, gross profit was negatively impacted by the sale of higher-cost inventory in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to increases in steel costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses within Energy increased approximately $3.5 million to $19.2 million, or 15.3% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $15.7 million, or 16.7% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as selling, general and administrative expenses increased in support of our branch facility growth initiatives. However, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales due to the continued fixed cost reductions implemented throughout 2010 and 2011 and operating leverage gained on the higher sales levels.

Overall, operating profit within Energy increased approximately $3.6 million to $14.9 million, or 11.9% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $11.4 million, or 12.0% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, due principally to the leverage gained by higher sales levels, which was partially offset by an unfavorable mix shift, with the increased new branch sales at lower margins as they penetrate new markets, higher cost inventory sales and higher selling, general and administrative expenses in support of our growth initiatives.

Energy's Adjusted EBITDA increased $3.1 million to $15.7 million, or 12.5% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $12.6 million, or 13.4% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. After consideration of a $1.0 million charge recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 in other expense, net related to the reduction of an indemnification asset related to an uncertain tax position, $0.7 million higher depreciation and amortization expense in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, primarily related to the South Texas Bolt & Fitting acquisition, and $0.2 million higher losses on sales denominated in foreign currencies in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, the change in Adjusted EBITDA was consistent with the increase in operating profit between years.

Table of Contents

Aerospace & Defense. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $6.7 million, or 12.5%, to $60.2 million, as compared to $53.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Sales in our aerospace business increased approximately $11.3 million, primarily due to higher sales levels in our blind bolt and temporary fastener product lines to our distribution customers, continuing the trend that began in the third quarter of 2010 of higher order activity in the aerospace bolt and fastener supply chain. Sales in our defense business decreased approximately $4.6 million, due to decreases in revenue of approximately $3.3 million primarily associated with managing the relocation to and establishment of the new defense facility and $1.3 million of revenues primarily related to the maintenance contracts on the former defense facility which ended in the first quarter of 2010.

Gross profit within Aerospace & Defense increased approximately $2.7 million to $22.7 million, or 37.7% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $20.0 million, or 37.5% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the higher sales levels between years. The defense business experienced a significant reduction in gross profit dollars and margin due to the shift of sales from a completed maintenance contract in 2010 to all sales in 2011 being generated by the lower margin relocation and establishment of the new defense facility program. This decline in gross profit and margin in the defense business was slightly more than offset by an increase in gross profit dollars and margin in the aerospace business, primarily as a result of a more favorable product sales mix, with our composite material products comprising a larger percentage of the net sales.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $1.7 million to $8.7 million, or 14.4% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $7.0 million, or 13.1% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to higher costs for commissions and other costs incurred in our aerospace business in support of our growth initiatives.

Operating profit within Aerospace & Defense increased approximately $1.0 million to $14.0 million, or 23.3% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $13.0 million, or 24.4% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as increase in gross profit generated by the aerospace business more than offset the reduction in gross profit in the defense business and higher selling, general and administrative expenses.

Aerospace & Defense's Adjusted EBITDA increased approximately $1.2 million to $16.0 million, or 26.6% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $14.8 million, or 27.6% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the increase in operating profit between years after consideration of $0.2 million higher depreciation expense in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010.

Engineered Components. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $49.1 million, or 63.1%, to $126.9 million, as compared to $77.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Sales in our industrial cylinder business increased by approximately $28.0 million. Of this increase, approximately $8.2 million was due to our Taylor-Wharton asset acquisition during the second quarter of 2010, approximately $9.5 million was due to market share gains, primarily of large high pressure cylinders to existing customers, and $1.1 million was due to new product introductions, primarily related to cellular phone tower and breathing air applications. The remainder of the increase was primarily due to the continued upturn in economic conditions. Sales of slow speed and compressor engines and related products increased by approximately $21.1 million, as sales of engines and engine parts increased approximately $12.2 million due to increased drilling activity as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Sales of gas compression products and processing and meter run equipment increased by approximately $8.9 million, as we continue to introduce new products to add to our well-site content.

Gross profit within Engineered Components increased approximately $11.8 million to $27.4 million, or 21.6% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $15.6 million, or 20.1% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Gross profit increased approximately $9.9 million as a result of the increase in sales levels between years. In addition, we experienced margin expansion in both our industrial cylinder and engine businesses, as their sales increased without significant additional fixed cost requirements.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $1.7 million to $8.6 million, or 6.7% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $6.9 million, or 8.9% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of increased sales and promotional spending in support of our sales growth projects. However, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales due to the continued fixed cost reductions implemented throughout 2010 and 2011 and operating leverage gained on the higher sales levels.

Operating profit within Engineered Components increased $10.4 million to approximately $19.0 million, or 15.0% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to operating profit of $8.6 million, or 11.1% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the higher sales levels between years, continued production efficiencies realized and higher operating leverage, all of which were partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses in support of our sales growth initiatives.

Table of Contents

Engineered Components' Adjusted EBITDA increased $10.7 million to $21.6 million, or 17.1% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $10.9 million, or 14.1% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the increase in operating profit between years after consideration of approximately $0.7 million in additional depreciation expense in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010 and the $0.4 million gain on bargain purchase in the first nine months of 2010, both primarily related to the asset acquisition within our industrial cylinder business.

Cequent Asia Pacific. Net sales increased approximately $10.4 million, or 18.1%, to $67.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $57.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Net sales were favorably impacted by approximately $9.4 million of currency exchange, as our reported results in U.S. dollars were positively impacted as a result of the weaker U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies. Excluding the impact of currency exchange, sales increased approximately $1.0 million, as sales increases for new business awards, primarily in Thailand, were more than offset by lower consumer spending levels in Australia compared to the higher levels experienced during the first nine months of 2010, which were boosted by government stimulus incentives, and also due to the December 2010 through January 2011 Queensland, Australia flooding coupled with reduced vehicle availability as a result of the tsunami in Japan.

Cequent Asia Pacific's gross profit increased approximately $2.4 million to $17.8 million, or 26.4% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from approximately $15.4 million, or 27.0% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Gross profit was favorably impacted by approximately $2.7 million of currency exchange. Excluding the impact of currency exchange, gross profit decreased by $0.3 million, primarily due to a less favorable product sales mix.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $2.1 million to $8.0 million, or 11.9% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $6.0 million, or 10.4% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Of this increase, approximately $1.1 million was due to currency exchange. The remaining $1.0 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily in support of our growth initiatives.

Cequent Asia Pacific's operating profit increased approximately $0.3 million to approximately $9.7 million, or 14.4% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $9.4 million, or 16.5% of net sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Operating profit was favorably impacted by approximately $1.4 million of currency exchange. Excluding the impact of currency exchange, operating profit decreased by $1.1 million, primarily as a result of the less favorable sales mix and higher spending in selling, general and administrative expenses in support of our sales growth initiatives.

Cequent Asia Pacific's Adjusted EBITDA increased approximately $0.7 million to $12.2 million, or 18.0% of sales, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $11.5 million, or 20.1% of sales, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, consistent with the increase in operating profit between years after consideration of $0.7 million of additional depreciation expense in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010 and $0.3 million higher losses on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010.

Cequent North America. Net sales increased approximately $32.6 million, or 11.9% to $306.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $273.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to year-over-year increases within our retail, original equipment, aftermarket and industrial channels, all of which were aided by the economic recovery that began in 2010 and continued through the third quarter of 2011. Sales in our retail channel increased approximately $14.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, with approximately 40% of the increase related to a one-time stocking order by one significant customer for a new product placement of cargo management products during the first quarter of 2011, 40% of the increase related to product sales to new customers and 20% of the increase related to market share gains at certain of our existing customers to whom we now provide additional products. Sales within our aftermarket channel increased approximately $8.1 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to market share gains and new product introductions. Sales in our industrial channel increased approximately $5.6 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to sales to new customers and higher levels of trailer‑builds, which use our towing, trailer and electrical products. Sales to original equipment manufacturers and suppliers increased approximately $5.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the full run rate of sales generated from our new product launches throughout 2010.

Cequent North America's gross profit increased approximately $7.2 million to $83.7 million, or 27.3% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from approximately $76.5 million, or 28.0% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the increase in sales levels between years and savings generated from continued productivity projects, primarily via negotiated vendor cost reductions and new process automation. However, gross profit margins declined by 70 basis points, as these increases in gross profit were partially offset by delays of certain sales price increases to customers in response to the higher commodity costs, primarily steel and copper, in order to to continue to generate market share gains, primarily in the aftermarket and industrial channels.

Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $4.7 million to $53.0 million, or 17.3% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $48.3 million, or 17.7% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of new sales promotions, advertising commissions and other costs previously deferred that support our sales growth initiatives and higher sales levels in the first nine months of 2011. While our spending levels increased in support of the higher sales levels, selling, general and administrative expenses declined by 40 basis points year-over-year as a percentage of sales.

Cequent North America's operating profit increased approximately $2.5 million to $30.6 million, or 10.0% of sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $28.2 million, or 10.3% of net sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in operating profit is due primarily to the higher sales levels and continued productivity projects, which were partially offset by the delay of certain pricing actions to customers in response to higher commodity and freight costs to continue to generate market share gains, and increased selling, general and administrative expenses in support of the higher sales levels and our sales growth initiatives.

Cequent North America's Adjusted EBITDA increased approximately $1.3 million to $39.1 million, or 12.8% of sales, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $37.8 million, or 13.8% of sales, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. After consideration of approximately $0.9 million of lower depreciation and amortization expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $0.1 million higher losses on transactions denominated in foreign currencies in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 than in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the change in Adjusted EBITDA is consistent with the increase in operating profit between years.

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses included in operating profit and Adjusted EBITDA consist of the following:



	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(in millions)
Corporate operating expenses	$	8.6		$	7.8
Employee costs and related benefits	11.9			10.6
Corporate expenses—operating profit	$	20.5		$	18.4
Other, net	(0.8		)	—
Corporate expenses—Adjusted EBITDA	$	19.7		$	18.4

Corporate expenses included in operating profit increased approximately $2.1 million to $20.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $18.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase between years is primarily attributed to an increase in third party professional fees, primarily supporting our international growth efforts, and higher employee costs and related benefits, primarily incurred due to increasing our support staff to bring certain competencies, primarily in tax and legal-related functions, in-house to better support our businesses' growth initiatives rather than outsourcing. Other expense, net decreased by $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to gains on transactions denominated in foreign currencies.

Discontinued Operations. The results of discontinued operations consist of our precision tool cutting and specialty fitting lines of business, which we committed to a plan to exit the businesses in the third quarter of 2011, our medical device line of business, which was sold in May 2010, and our property management line of business, which was sold in April 2010. Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $8.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. See Note 2, "Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale," to our consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report on Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $35.6 million and $61.6 million, respectively. Significant changes in cash flows provided by operating activities and the reasons for such changes are as follows:

•

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company generated $95.2 million of cash, based on the reported net income from operations of $47.1 million and after considering the effects of non-cash items related to gains and losses on dispositions of property and equipment, depreciation, amortization, compensation, changes in deferred income taxes, debt extinguishment costs and other, net. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company generated $78.6 million in cash flows based on the reported net income of $39.6 million and after considering the effects of similar non-cash items.

•

Increases in accounts receivable resulted in a use of cash of approximately $39.1 million and $31.4 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in accounts receivable is due primarily to the increase in year-over-year sales and the timing of those sales within the quarter. Our days sales outstanding of receivables increased slightly to 52 days from 48 days as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

•

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we used approximately $13.5 million of cash for investment in our inventories. Inventory levels increased primarily to support the increased sales volumes. In addition, we made additional opportunistic investments in inventory levels in certain of our businesses in order to gain market share, ensuring we would have availability when our competitors experienced inventory shortages. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we used approximately $3.2 million of cash relative to our investment in inventory.

•

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, accounts payable and accrued liabilities resulted in a net use of cash of approximately $4.8 million, as compared to a net source of cash of $19.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The change in cash provided by or used for accounts payable and accrued liabilities is primarily a result of the timing of payments made to suppliers, as the days of accounts payable on hand increased in 2011 as compared to 2010.


•	Prepaid expenses and other assets resulted in a use of cash of approximately $2.3 million and $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, due primarily to additional investments in manufacturing supplies, spare parts and tooling assets, to support our increased sales levels.

Net cash used for investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $49.9 million and $9.1 million, respectively. During the first nine months of 2011, we paid approximately $28.6 million for business acquisitions, primarily from paying $27.0 million for the stock acquisition of Innovative Molding within our Packaging reportable segment. We also incurred approximately $23.5 million for capital expenditures, which increased over the nine months ended September 30, 2010 levels as we have increased our investment in growth and productivity-related capital projects due to the economic improvements. Cash received from the disposition of assets was approximately $2.2 million. During the first nine months of 2010, we paid approximately $12.8 million for business acquisitions, primarily for the asset acquisition within our Norris Cylinder business. We also invested approximately $11.1 million in capital expenditures. Cash used for the asset purchases in 2010 was partially offset by the sale of our property management line of business, our medical device line of business and other asset dispositions of approximately $14.7 million.

Net cash used by financing activities was approximately $21.5 million and $15.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the second quarter of 2011, we paid $15.0 million on our term loan per the excess cash flow provisions of our previous credit agreement. Following this payment, in June 2011, we completed the refinance of our U.S. bank debt, repaying the remaining $233.0 million term loan and borrowing $225.0 million on the new term loan facility. In addition, during the during the first nine months of 2011, we increased outstanding borrowings on our revolving credit facility by $5.0 million, and $0.6 million on our credit facility in Australia. During the first nine months of 2010, we decreased amounts outstanding on our revolving credit facilities by approximately $5.7 million and made scheduled repayments under our U.S. and Australian term loans.

Table of Contents

Our Debt and Other Commitments

We are party to a credit facility consisting of a $110.0 million revolving credit facility and a $225.0 million term loan facility (collectively, the "Credit Facility"). At September 30, 2011, $224.4 million was outstanding on the term loan and $5.0 million was outstanding on the revolving credit facility. The Credit Facility allows issuance of letters of credit, not to exceed $50.0 million in aggregate, against revolving credit facility commitments.

The Credit Facility also provides for incremental revolving credit facility commitments, not to exceed $125.0 million, and incremental term loan facility commitments, not to exceed $200.0 million. Under the Credit Facility, we are also able to issue unsecured indebtedness in connection with permitted acquisitions, as defined, as long as we, on a proforma basis, after giving effect to such acquisition, are in compliance with all applicable financial covenants, as defined.

Under the Credit Facility, if, prior to June 22, 2012, we prepay the term loan ($225.0 million) using a new term loan facility with lower interest rate margins, then we will be required to pay a 1% premium of the aggregate principal amount prepaid. In addition, we are required to make a prepayment of our term loan facility pursuant to an excess cash flow sweep provision, equal to 50% of the computed amount of excess cash flow generated during the year, as defined. In April 2011, we prepaid $15.0 million of term loan principal under the excess cash flow sweep provision of the previous credit agreement.

Amounts drawn under our revolving credit facilities fluctuate daily based upon our working capital and other ordinary course needs. Availability under our revolving credit facilities depends upon, among other things, compliance with our credit agreement's financial covenants. Our Credit Facility contains negative and affirmative covenants and other requirements affecting us and our subsidiaries, including among others: restrictions on incurrence of debt (except for permitted acquisitions and subordinated indebtedness), liens, mergers, investments, loans, advances, guarantee obligations, acquisitions, asset dispositions, sale-leaseback transactions, hedging agreements, dividends and other restricted junior payments, stock repurchases, transactions with affiliates, restrictive agreements and amendments to charters, by-laws, and other material documents. The terms of our Credit Facility require us and our subsidiaries to meet certain restrictive financial covenants and ratios computed quarterly, including a leverage ratio (total consolidated indebtedness plus outstanding amounts under the accounts receivable securitization facility over consolidated EBITDA, as defined), interest expense coverage ratio (consolidated EBITDA, as defined, over cash interest expense, as defined) and a capital expenditures covenant. The most restrictive of these financial covenants are the leverage ratio and interest expense coverage ratio. Our permitted leverage ratio under the Credit Facility is 4.00 to 1.00 for July 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012, 3.75 to 1.00 for April 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012, 3.50 to 1.00 for October 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013, 3.25 to 1.00 from July 1, 2013 and thereafter. Our actual leverage ratio was 2.65 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011. Our permitted interest expense coverage ratio under the Credit Facility is 2.50 to 1.00 for July 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012, 2.75 to 1.00 for April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, 3.00 to 1.00 for January 1, 2013 and thereafter. Our actual interest expense coverage ratio was 4.04 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011. At September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with our financial covenants.

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of net income, as reported, which is a GAAP measure of our operating results, to Consolidated Bank EBITDA, as defined in our credit agreement, for the twelve months ended September 30, 2011:



				Less:			Add:
	Year Ended December 31, 2010			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011		Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Net income, as reported	$	45,270		$	39,580		$	47,110	$	52,800
Bank stipulated adjustments:
Interest expense, net (as defined)	52,380			40,200			34,370		46,550
Income tax expense⁽¹⁾	21,450			23,580			23,750		21,620
Depreciation and amortization	37,740			28,270			29,940		39,410
Non-cash compensation expense⁽²⁾	2,180			1,050			2,580		3,710
Other non-cash expenses or losses	4,180			3,140			2,440		3,480
Non-recurring expenses or costs in connection with acquisition integration⁽³⁾	640			70			250		820
Debt extinguishment costs⁽⁴⁾	—			—			3,970		3,970
Non-recurring expenses or costs for cost saving projects	—			—			220		220
Negative EBITDA from discontinued operations⁽⁵⁾	200			150			—		50
Permitted dispositions⁽⁶⁾	(6,340		)	(9,790		)	—		3,450
Permitted acquisitions⁽⁷⁾	8,260			6,910			2,650		4,000
Consolidated Bank EBITDA, as defined	$	165,960		$	133,160		$	147,280	$	180,080



	September 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Total long-term debt⁽⁸⁾	$	476,450
Aggregate funding under the receivables securitization facility	—
Total Consolidated Indebtedness, as defined	$	476,450
Consolidated Bank EBITDA, as defined	$	180,080
Actual leverage ratio	2.65		x
Covenant requirement	4.00		x



	Year Ended December 31, 2010			Less: Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Add: Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011			Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest expense, net (as reported)	$	52,380		$	40,200		$	34,370		$	46,550
Bank stipulated adjustments:
Interest income	(460		)	(350		)	(310		)	(420		)
Non-cash amounts attributable to amortization of financing costs	(2,960		)	(2,210		)	(2,230		)	(2,980		)
Pro forma adjustment for acquisitions and dispositions	4,890			4,160			700			1,430
Total Consolidated Cash Interest Expense, as defined	$	53,850		$	41,800		$	32,530		$	44,580

Table of Contents



	September 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Bank EBITDA, as defined	$	180,080
Total Consolidated Cash Interest Expense, as defined	44,580
Actual interest expense ratio	4.04		x
Covenant requirement	2.50		x

______________________


⁽¹⁾	Amount includes tax expense associated with discontinued operations.


⁽²⁾	Non-cash expenses resulting from the grant of restricted shares of common stock and common stock options.


⁽³⁾	Non-recurring costs and expenses arising from the integration of any business acquired not to exceed $25,000,000 in the aggregate.


⁽⁴⁾	Costs incurred with refinancing our credit facilities.


⁽⁵⁾	Not to exceed $10,000,000 in any fiscal year.


⁽⁶⁾	EBITDA from permitted dispositions, as defined.


⁽⁷⁾	EBITDA from permitted acquisitions, as defined.


⁽⁸⁾	Includes $0.5 million of acquisition deferred purchase price.

In addition to our U.S. bank debt, in Australia, we are party to a debt agreement with a bank in the amount of $10 million Australian dollars. At September 30, 2011, the balance outstanding under this agreement was approximately $0.6 million at an interest rate of 6.7%. Borrowings under this arrangement are secured by substantially all the assets of our local business which is also subject to financial and reporting covenants. Financial covenants include a capital adequacy ratio (tangible net worth over total tangible assets) and an interest coverage ratio (EBIT over gross interest cost) and we were in compliance with such covenants at September 30, 2011.

Another important source of liquidity is our accounts receivable facility, under which we have the ability to sell eligible accounts receivable to a third-party multi-seller receivables funding company. We amended the facility in September 2011, increasing the committed funding from $75.0 million to $90.0 million, and reducing the margin on amounts outstanding from a range of 2.75%-3.50%, depending on leverage ratio, to a range of 1.50%-1.75% depending on the amount drawn under the facility. The amendment also reduced the cost of the unused portion of the facility from a range of 0.50%-1.00%, depending on usage amount, to 0.45% and extended the maturity date from December 29, 2012 to September 15, 2015. We incurred approximately $0.1 million in fees and expenses to complete the amendment. We did not have any amounts outstanding under the facility as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010, but had $70.3 million and $41.4 million, respectively, available but not utilized.

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $5.0 million and $0.0 million, respectively, outstanding under our revolving credit capacity and had an additional $81.9 million and $79.3 million, respectively, potentially available after giving effect to approximately $23.1 million and $23.7 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued and outstanding. The letters of credit are used for a variety of purposes, including support of certain operating lease agreements, vendor payment terms and other subsidiary operating activities, and to meet various states' requirements to self-insure workers' compensation claims, including incurred but not reported claims. Including availability under our accounts receivable facility and after consideration of leverage restrictions contained in the Credit Facility, we had $152.2 million and $120.7 million, respectively, of borrowing capacity available for general corporate purposes.

Our available revolving credit capacity under the Credit Facility, after consideration of approximately $23.1 million in letters of credit outstanding related thereto, is approximately $81.9 million, while our available liquidity under our accounts receivable facility ranges from $40 million to $75 million, depending on the level of our receivables outstanding at a given point in time during the year. We rely upon our cash flow from operations and available liquidity under our revolving credit and accounts receivable facilities to fund our debt service obligations and other contractual commitments, working capital and capital expenditure requirements. Our weighted average daily amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facilities and accounts receivable facilities during the first nine months of 2011 approximated $61.5 million, compared to the weighted average daily amounts outstanding during the first nine months of 2010 of $36.2 million. The increase in average daily amounts outstanding was primarily due to an increase in working capital to fund the higher sales levels as well as an increase in capital investment in our businesses. During the nine months ended 2011, we used approximately $28.3 million more cash on capital investment into our businesses as compared to the first nine months of 2010. Generally, we use available liquidity under these facilities to fund capital expenditures

Table of Contents

and daily working capital requirements during the first half of the year, as we experience some seasonality in our two Cequent reportable segments, primarily within Cequent North America. Sales of towing and trailering products within this segment are generally stronger in the second and third quarters, as original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), distributors and retailers acquire product for the spring and summer selling seasons. None of our other reportable segments experiences any significant seasonal fluctuations in their respective businesses. During the second half of the year, the investment in working capital is reduced and amounts outstanding under our revolving credit and receivable facilities are paid down. While this is the general trend in cash flow due to seasonality, our daily average amounts outstanding increased during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2011, primarily as the cash paid for the Innovative Molding acquisition and incremental capital expenditure projects more than offset the cash generated via working capital reductions for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. At the end of each quarter, we use cash on hand from our domestic and foreign subsidiaries to pay down amounts outstanding under our revolving credit and accounts receivable facilities.

Cash management related to our revolving credit and accounts receivable facilities is centralized. We monitor our cash position and available liquidity on a daily basis and forecast our cash needs on a weekly basis within the current quarter and on a monthly basis outside the current quarter over the remainder of the year. Our business and related cash forecasts are updated monthly. Given aggregate available funding under our revolving credit and accounts receivable facilities of $152.2 million at September 30, 2011, after consideration of the aforementioned leverage restrictions, and based on forecasted cash sources and requirements inherent in our business plans, we believe that our liquidity and capital resources, including anticipated cash flows from operations, will be sufficient to meet our debt service, capital expenditure and other short-term and long-term obligation needs for the foreseeable future.

We are subject to variable interest rates on our term loan and revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2011, 1-Month LIBOR approximated 0.23%. Based on our variable rate-based borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2011, a 1% increase in 1-Month LIBOR would increase our interest expense by approximately $0.1 million annually, considering our Credit Facility term loan is subject to a 1.25% LIBOR-floor, and a 1% increase in 1-Month LIBOR would not impact our current effective interest rate on this portion of our debt, as the resulting rate would remain below the 1.25% floor.

Principal payments required under our U.S. Credit Facility term loan are: $0.6 million due each calendar quarter through March 31, 2017, and $212.1 million due on June 21, 2017.

We also have $250.0 million (face value) 9³/4% senior secured notes ("Senior Notes") outstanding at September 30, 2011, due 2017. Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at the rate of 9.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15.

Prior to December 15, 2012, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 109.750% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the applicable redemption date plus additional interest, if any, with the net cash proceeds of one or more equity offerings, provided that at least 65% of the original principal amount of Senior Notes issued remains outstanding after such redemption, and provided further that each such redemption occurs within 90 days of the date of closing of each such equity offering.

In addition to our long-term debt, we have other cash commitments related to leases. We account for these lease transactions as operating leases and annual rent expense for continuing operations related thereto approximated $14.8 million. We expect to continue to utilize leasing as a financing strategy in the future to meet capital expenditure needs and to reduce debt levels.

Market Risk

We conduct business in several locations throughout the world and are subject to market risk due to changes in the value of foreign currencies. We do not currently use derivative financial instruments to manage these risks. The functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are the local currency in the country of domicile. We manage these operating activities at the local level and revenues and costs are generally denominated in local currencies; however, results of operations and assets and liabilities reported in U.S. dollars will fluctuate with changes in exchange rates between such local currencies and the U.S. dollar.

Common Stock

We voluntarily transferred our stock exchange listing in the U.S. from the New York Stock Exchange to the NASDAQ Global Market^SM effective August 24, 2009. Effective January 3, 2011, TriMas became eligible for inclusion, and is now listed, in the NASDAQ Global Select Market^SM. Our stock continues to trade under the symbol "TRS."

Table of Contents

Credit Rating

We and certain of our outstanding debt obligations are rated by Standard & Poor's and Moody's. On August 24, 2011, Standard & Poor's upgraded our outlook to positive and affirmed our credit facilities, senior secured notes, and corporate credit ratings of BB, B-, and B+, respectively. On June 3, 2011, Moody's assigned a Ba2 rating to our senior secured credit facilities, and affirmed our corporate family rating at B1 and our outlook as positive; our ratings on our senior secured notes remained at B3. If our credit ratings were to decline, our ability to access certain financial markets may become limited, the perception of us in the view of our customers, suppliers and security holders may worsen and as a result, we may be adversely affected.

Outlook

We entered 2011 cautiously optimistic that, given a continued economic recovery, we could continue to build upon the progress made in the past two years to reduce our cost structure, increase our flexibility and maintain a culture of continuous improvement in all that we do. We believe that our results through the first nine months of 2011 continue to build on the positive momentum generated in the past two years, as we benefited from continued economic recovery and experienced significant market share gains in many of our reportable segments. Given the economic recovery and the success of some of our growth initiatives, we decided to strategically increase our investments in inventory levels and capital projects in certain of our businesses to capture additional market share and expand upon our existing growth and productivity initiatives. We also decided to continue our strategic acquisitions of smaller bolt-on businesses in our key platforms, adding both synergies and geographic expansion. While we did experience a less favorable product sales mix within our reportable segments and made certain pricing decisions to aggressively price certain products to penetrate new markets and to delay certain commodity cost increases at certain customers to capture additional market share, we were able to offset much of the margin pressure with our ongoing cost savings and productivity initiatives. We believe we remain well-positioned to achieve further market share gains and generate additional operating leverage as a result of our low fixed cost structure, and we have the capacity to fulfill yet higher net sales levels without incurring significant incremental fixed costs.

Our priorities remain consistent with our strategic aspirations: continuing to identify and execute on cost savings and productivity initiatives that fund core growth, reduce cycle times and secure our position as best cost producer, to grow revenue via new products and expand our core products in non-U.S. markets, to continue to reduce our debt leverage and to increase our available liquidity. While our existing debt structure does not have material current debt maturities, significant deterioration in general economic conditions would adversely impact our anticipated revenue growth and financial performance.

Impact of New Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-4, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs" ("ASU 2011-4"). ASU 2011-4 amends guidance listed under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement" and represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board on fair value measurement. The guidance clarifies how a principal market is determined, addresses the fair value measurement of instruments with offsetting market or counterparty credit risks, addresses the concept of valuation premise and highest and best use, extends the prohibition on blockage factors to all three levels of the fair value hierarchy and requires additional disclosures. ASU 2011-4 will be effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We are currently evaluating the requirements of ASU 2011-4 and have not yet determined its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-5, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2011-5"). ASU 2011-5 amends guidance listed under ASC Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income" and eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders' equity. Under the amendments to ASC Topic 220, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments also require an entity to present on the face of the financial statements the reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income. ASU 2011-5 will be effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-5 will only affect the presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-8, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing for Goodwill Impairment." ASU 2011-8 gives companies the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, and in some cases, skip the two-step impairment test. The objective of the revised standard is to simplify how an entity tests goodwill for impairment and to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-8 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating this guidance and the potential impact of the revised standard on our annual goodwill impairment test.

Critical Accounting Policies

Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, our evaluation of business and macroeconomic trends, and information from other outside sources, as appropriate.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, there were no material changes to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We are also subject to interest risk as it relates to long-term debt. See Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," for details about our primary market risks, and the objectives and strategies used to manage these risks. Also see Note 7, "Long-term Debt," in Part I, Item 1, "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements," included within this Form 10-Q for additional information.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

As of September 30, 2011, an evaluation was carried out by management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed only to provide reasonable assurance that they will meet their objectives. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of September 30, 2011, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that they would meet their objectives.

Changes in disclosure controls and procedures

There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

TRIMAS CORPORATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Note 9, "Commitments and Contingencies," included in Part I, Item 1, "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements," within this Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A., "Risk Factors," in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no significant changes in our risk factors as disclosed in our 2010 Form 10-K, except for updating the risk factor related to Heartland's ownership of our voting common equity and updating the status of the union activities at our Houston, Texas facility as follows:

Heartland owns approximately 20.9% of our voting common equity.

Heartland Industrial Partners (“Heartland”) beneficially owns approximately 20.9% of our outstanding voting common equity as of September 30, 2011. As a result, Heartland has the power to strongly influence all matters submitted to our stockholders and all decisions to enter into any corporate transaction and any transaction that requires the approval of stockholders, regardless of whether other stockholders believe that any such transactions are in their own best interests. For example, Heartland could strongly influence our decisions to make acquisitions that increase the amount of our indebtedness, sell revenue-generating assets or strongly influence our decisions to undergo a “going private” transaction with it or one of its affiliates. So long as Heartland continues to own a significant amount of the outstanding shares of our common stock, it will continue to be able to strongly influence our decisions. Its interests may differ from other stockholders and it may vote in a way with which other stockholders disagree. In addition, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of preventing, discouraging or deterring a change of control. One of our directors is the Managing Member of Heartland’s general partner.

We may be subject to further unionization and work stoppages at our facilities or our customers may be subject to work stoppages, which could seriously impact the profitability of our business.

On November 4, 2009, we recognized the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union ("Union") at our Houston, Texas facility which is included in our Energy segment, due to the Union obtaining a simple majority of authorization cards during an organizing drive. On December 10, 2009, we received a notice of filing petition for union decertification this facility. A decertification vote administered by the National Labor Relations Board occurred on August 26, 2010; however, those ballots were impounded in light of the Union's field request for review. On August 26, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board determined that the impounded ballots from the decertification vote would not be counted.

The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deemed to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations or cash flows.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Reserved.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibits Index:



3.1(l)	Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TriMas Corporation.
3.2 (af)	Second Amended and Restated By‑laws of TriMas Corporation.
4.1(a)	Indenture relating to the 9⁷₈% senior subordinated notes, dated as of June 6, 2002, by and among TriMas Corporation, each of the Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as Trustee, (including Form of Note as Exhibit).
4.2(c)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 4, 2003.
4.3(d)	Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 9, 2003.
4.4(e)	Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 6, 2003.
4.5(p)	Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 28, 2008.
4.6(aa)	Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 26, 2009.
4.7(z)	Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 29, 2009.
4.8(z)	Indenture relating to the 9 ¾% senior secured notes dated as of December 29, 2009, among TriMas Corporation, the Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee.
10.1(a)	Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May 17, 2002 by and among Heartland Industrial Partners, L.P., TriMas Corporation and Metaldyne Company LLC.
10.2(a)	Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated as of July 19, 2002 by and among TriMas Corporation and Metaldyne Corporation.
10.3(j)	Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement dated as of August 31, 2006.
10.4(i)	Credit Agreement dated as of June 6, 2002, as amended and restated as of August 2, 2006 among TriMas Corporation, TriMas Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and Comerica Bank, as Syndication Agent.
10.5(y)	Credit Agreement dated as of June 6, 2002, as amended and restated as of August 2, 2006, as further amended and restated as of December 16, 2009, among TriMas Corporation, TriMas Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Comerica Bank, as Syndication Agent and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Bookrunner.
10.6(z)	Credit Agreement dated as of June 6, 2002, as amended and restated as of August 2, 2006, as further amended and restated as of December 16, 2009, as further amended and restated as of January 13, 2010, among TriMas Corporation, TriMas Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Comerica Bank, as Syndication Agent, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Bookrunner.
10.7(ai)	Credit Agreement dated as of June 21, 2011, among TriMas Corporation, TriMas Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC., as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner.
10.8(a)	Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2002, by and among TriMas Corporation, the Sellers party thereto and TSPC, Inc., as Purchaser.
10.9(t)	Amendment No. 1 as of February 13, 2009 to Receivables Purchase Agreement.
10.10(a)	Receivables Transfer Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2002, by and among TSPC, Inc., as Transferor, TriMas Corporation, individually, as Collection Agent, TriMas Company LLC, individually as Guarantor, the CP Conduit Purchasers, Committed Purchasers and Funding Agents party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank as Administrative Agent.
10.11(k)	Amendment dated as of June 3, 2005, to Receivables Transfer Agreement.
10.12(h)	Amendment dated as of July 5, 2005, to Receivables Transfer Agreement.
10.13(n)	Amendment dated as of December 31, 2007, to Receivables Transfer Agreement.
10.14(o)	Amendment dated as of February 22, 2008, to Receivables Transfer Agreement.
10.15(t)	Amendment dated as of February 13, 2009, to Receivables Transfer Agreement.
10.16(p)	TriMas Receivables Facility Amended and Restated Fee Letter dated February 22, 2008.
10.17(t)	TriMas Receivables Facility Amended and Restated Fee Letter dated February 13, 2009.
10.18(z)	Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2009, among TriMas Corporation, the Sellers named therein and TSPC, Inc. as Purchaser.
10.19(aj)	Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 15, 2011 to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement.

Table of Contents



10.20(z)	Receivables Transfer Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2009, among TSPC, Inc., as Transferor, TriMas Corporation, as Collection Agent, TriMas Company LLC, as Guarantor, the persons party thereto from time to time as Purchasers and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.
10.21(aj)	Amended and Restated Receivables Transfer Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2011, among TSPC, Inc., as Transferor, TriMas Corporation, as Collection Agent, TriMas Company LLC, as Guarantor, the persons party thereto from time to time as Purchasers and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as LC Issuer and Administrative Agent.
10.22(a)	Lease Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2002, by and among Heartland Industrial Group, L.L.C., TriMas Company LLC and the Guarantors named therein.
10.23(a)	TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan.
10.24(r)	First Amendment to the TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan.
10.25(r)	Second Amendment to the TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan.
10.26(r)	Third Amendment to the TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan.
10.27(r)	Fourth Amendment to the TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan.
10.28(d)	Asset Purchase Agreement among TriMas Corporation, Metaldyne Corporation and Metaldyne Company LLC dated May 9, 2003, (including Exhibit A - Form of Sublease Agreement).
10.29(f)	2003 Form of Stock Option Agreement.
10.30(g)	Form of Indemnification Agreement.
10.31(j)	Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2006 by and among Heartland Industrial Partners, L.P., TriMas Corporation and Metaldyne Corporation.
10.32(q)	Amendment No. 2 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2006 by and among Heartland Industrial Partners, L.P., TriMas Corporation and Metaldyne Corporation.
10.33(j)	Advisory Agreement, dated June 6, 2002 between Heartland Industrial Partners, L.P. and TriMas Corporation.
10.34(k)	First Amendment to Advisory Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2006 between Heartland Industrial Group, L.L.C. and TriMas Corporation.
10.35(k)	Second Amendment to Advisory Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2006 between Heartland Industrial Group, L.L.C. and TriMas Corporation.
10.36(k)	Management Rights Agreement.
10.37(x)	Executive Severance / Change of Control Policy.
10.38(ad)	TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Composite Plan Document.
10.39(w)	ISDA 2002 Master Agreement between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A. and TriMas Company LLC dated as of January 20, 2009.
10.40(r)	Interest Rate Swap Transaction letter Agreement between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and TriMas Company, LLC effective as of April 29, 2008.
10.41(aa)	Interest Rate Swap Transaction letter Agreement between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and TriMas Company, LLC effective as of October 28, 2009.
10.42(s)	Offer Letter from TriMas Corporation to David M. Wathen dated as of January 12, 2009.
10.43(u)	TriMas Corporation Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement.
10.44(v)	2009 TriMas Incentive Compensation Plan.
10.45(ac)	2010 TriMas Incentive Compensation Plan.
10.46(x)	Flexible Cash Allowance Policy.
10.47(aa)	TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement - 2009 Additional Grant.
10.48(aa)	TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement - 2009 162(m) Conversion Grant.
10.49(aa)	TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement - 2009 Conversion and Additional Grants.
10.50(ab)	TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement.

Table of Contents



10.51(ab)	TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Share Award Agreement.
10.52(ab)	TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.
10.53(ae)	Asset Purchase Agreement among TW Cylinders LLC, Taylor-Wharton International LLC and Norris Cylinder Company dated as of April 30, 2010.
10.54(ag)	TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Share Award Agreement - 2011 Grant
10.55(ag)	TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement - 2011 Award
10.56(ag)	TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement - 2011 Award
10.57(ah)	2011 TriMas Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan
10.58	Summary of Compensation for the Board of Directors of TriMas Corporation, effective August 5, 2011.
10.59	TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement - Board of Directors.
31.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.



(a)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed on October 4, 2002 (File No. 333-100351).
(b)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed on January 28, 2003 (File No. 333-100351).
(c)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003 (File No. 333-100351).
(d)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed June 9, 2003 (File No. 333-105950).
(e)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2003 (File No. 333-100351).
(f)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2003 (File No. 333-100351).
(g)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed on June 29, 2004 (File No. 333-113917).
(h)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2005 (File No. 333-100351).
(i)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits⁽¹⁾ filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2006 (File No. 333-100351). ⁽¹⁾ Schedules and Exhibits to the filing are filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-10716).
(j)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on September 19, 2006 (File No. 333-136263).
(k) (l)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on January 18, 2007 (File No. 333-136263). Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 3, 2007 (File No. 333-100351).
(m)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on August 31, 2007 (File No. 333-145815).
(n)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2008 (File No. 001-10716).

Table of Contents



(o) (p)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on February 26, 2008 (File No. 001-10716). Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2008 (File No. 001-10716).
(q)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2008 (File No. 001-10716).
(r)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2008 (File No. 001-10716).
(s)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009 (File No. 001-10716).
(t)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2009 (File No. 001-10716).
(u)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2009 (File No. 001-10716).
(v)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2009 (File No. 001-10716).
(w)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2009 (File No. 001-10716).
(x)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on December 10, 2009 (File No. 001-10716).
(y)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits⁽²⁾ filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2009 (File No. 001-10716). ⁽²⁾ Schedule 2.01 and Exhibit L are filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-10716).
(z)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2010 (File No. 001-10716).
(aa)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 4, 2010 (File No. 001-10716).
(ab)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2010 (File No. 001-10716).
(ac)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on March 15, 2010 (File No. 001-10716).
(ad)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2010 (File No. 001-10716).
(ae)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 30, 2010 (File No. 001-10716).
(af)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2011 (File No. 001-10716).
(ag)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-10716).
(ah)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2011 (File No. 001-10716).
(ai)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2011 (File No. 001-10716).
(aj)		Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Report on Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2011 (File No. 001-10716).

Table of Contents

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		TRIMAS CORPORATION (Registrant)

			/s/ A. MARK ZEFFIRO

Date:	October 27, 2011	By:	A. Mark Zeffiro Chief Financial Officer

TRS-093011-Exh 10.58

Exhibit 10.58

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

TRIMAS CORPORATION

Independent directors receive the following compensation:



Compensation	Amount

Annual Cash Retainer (1)	$100,000 in aggregate, paid quarterly in arrears; except the Board Chair who receives $225,000, paid monthly in arrears (with effect from August 5, 2011)

Annual Equity Retainer (1)	TriMas Corporation (the “Company”) common stock having a fair market value (as of the grant date) of $100,000 in aggregate, granted annually and subject to a one year vesting period

Annual Fee for Audit Committee Chair:	$15,000

Annual Fee for Compensation Committee Chair:	$10,000

Annual Fee for Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair: Meeting fee for each Board and Committee Meeting:	$5,000 $1,000

________________________

(1) In accordance with the TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan and 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, independent directors are permitted to defer the receipt of all or a portion of the annual cash retainer, meeting fees and annual equity retainer until the termination of his or her service on the Board of Directors and for such deferred compensation to be denominated in restricted stock units, representing the right to receive shares of the Company's common stock at the end of the deferral period. During the deferral period, if the Company pays cash dividends on its common stock, the directors' deferral accounts will be credited with dividend equivalents on their deferred restricted stock units, payable in additional restricted stock units based on the then-fair market value of the Company's common stock. Each director's account is 100% vested at all times, subject to the one year vesting period with respect to the annual equity retainer.

The Company also reimburses members of the Board of Directors for all expenses incurred in attending meetings or performing their duties as directors.

Members of the Board of Directors who are employees or officers of the Company or any of its subsidiaries do not receive any compensation for serving on the Board of Directors or any committees thereof.

_______________

Effective August 5, 2011

TRS-093011-Exh 10.59

Exhibit 10.59

2011 Restricted Stock Award

To Board of Directors

TRIMAS CORPORATION

2006 LONG TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

TriMas Corporation (“Corporation”), as permitted by the TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”), hereby grants to the Grantee listed below (“Grantee”), a Restricted Stock Award for the number of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock set forth below (“Shares”), subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Restricted Stock Agreement (“Agreement”).

Unless otherwise defined in this Agreement, the terms used in this Agreement have the same meaning as defined in the Plan. The term “Service Provider” as used in this Agreement means an individual providing services to the Corporation or a Subsidiary. A Service Provider includes a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

I. NOTICE OF restricted STOCK award



Grantee:
Date of Agreement:
Grant Date:
Number of Restricted Shares in Award:

II. AGREEMENT

A. Grant of Restricted Stock. The Corporation hereby grants Shares of Restricted Stock to the Grantee for the number of Shares set forth above. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary anywhere else in this Agreement, the Shares of Restricted Stock in this Award are subject to the terms, definitions and provisions of the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference.

1. Restrictions on Transfer. The Shares of Restricted Stock are restricted from transfer until the restrictions lapse. Subject to the Grantee's termination of services, as described in Section 4, below, the Shares of Restricted Stock vest, and all restrictions lapse, on August 5, 2012. Upon vesting and the lapse of the restrictions, the associated Shares become freely transferable if the Grantee is still a Service Provider on that date. The Restricted Shares subject to the Award will be forfeited if the Grantee terminates his or her services with the Corporation or a Subsidiary prior to vesting and the lapse of restrictions, except as designated otherwise in this Agreement.

2. Rights as Stockholder. Except for the potential forfeitability of the Shares before the lapse of restrictions set forth in Section 1 above, the Grantee has all rights of a stockholder (including voting and dividend rights) commencing on the date of the Corporation's book entry evidencing the grant of Restricted Stock.

3. Adjustments. In the event of any stock dividend, reclassification, subdivision or combination, or similar transaction affecting the Shares of Restricted Stock covered by this Award, the rights of the Grantee will be adjusted as provided in Article X of the Plan.

4. Termination of Services. The Shares of Restricted Stock subject to this Award will be forfeited if the Grantee terminates his or her services with the Corporation or a Subsidiary, or if the Grantee's services are terminated by the Corporation for any reason before the Shares of Restricted Stock vest and the restrictions lapse. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Shares of Restricted Stock vest and the restrictions on transfer will lapse upon the death or Disability (as defined in the Plan) of the Grantee with respect to 100% of the Shares of Restricted Stock subject to this Agreement. Upon the lapse of the transfer restrictions, the Shares of Restricted Stock are fully transferable.

B. Other Terms and Conditions.

1. Non-Transferability of Award. Except as described below, this Award and the Restricted Shares subject to the Award may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by laws of descent or distribution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with the consent of the Administrator, the Grantee may assign or transfer the Award and its underlying Restricted Shares to a Permitted Assignee, provided the Permitted Assignee is bound by and subject to all terms and conditions of the Plan and this Agreement, and the Permitted Assignee executes an agreement satisfactory to the Corporation evidencing these obligations. The terms of this Award are binding on the executors, administrators, heirs, successors and assigns of the Grantee.

2. Other Restrictions on Share Issuance. Anything to the contrary notwithstanding, the Corporation's obligation to deliver Shares under this Award is subject to its compliance with federal and state laws, rules and regulations applying to the authorization, issuance or sale of securities as the Corporation deems necessary or advisable. The Corporation is not required to deliver Shares under this Agreement unless and until it receives satisfactory proof that the issuance or transfer of the Shares does not violate any of the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission promulgated thereunder, or the provisions of any state law governing the sale of securities or any stock exchange on which the Corporation's Shares may be listed, and that there has been compliance with the provisions of these acts, rules, regulations and state laws.

3. Withholding. Grantee agrees to tender sufficient funds to satisfy any applicable income and employment tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of and the lapse of restrictions on Shares of Restricted Stock under the Award. Alternatively, Grantee may request the Corporation to sell a number of Shares sufficient to satisfy any tax liabilities.

4. Dispute Resolution. Grantee and the Corporation agree that any disagreement, dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, validity, or the alleged breach thereof, will be settled exclusively and, consistent with the procedures specified in this Section, irrespective of its magnitude, the amount in controversy, or the nature of the relief sought.

(a)Negotiation. In the event of any dispute, controversy, claim, question or disagreement arising from or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the Grantee and the Corporation will use their best efforts to settle the dispute, claim, question or disagreement. To this effect, they will consult and negotiate with each other in good faith and, recognizing their mutual interests, attempt to reach a just and equitable solution satisfactory to both parties.

(b)Arbitration. If the Grantee and the Corporation do not reach a solution within a period of thirty (30) days, then, upon written notice by the Grantee to the Corporation or the Corporation to the Grantee, all disputes, claims, questions, controversies, or differences will be submitted to arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association (the “AAA”) in accordance with the provisions of its Employment Arbitration Rules (the “Arbitration Rules”).

(1) Arbitrator. The arbitration will be conducted by one arbitrator skilled in the arbitration of executive employment matters. The parties to the arbitration will jointly appoint the arbitrator within thirty (30) days after initiation of the arbitration. If the parties fail to appoint an arbitrator as provided above, an arbitrator with substantial experience in executive employment matters will be appointed by the AAA as provided in the Arbitration Rules. The Corporation will pay all of the fees, if any, and expenses of the arbitrator and the arbitration, unless otherwise determined by the arbitrator. Each party to the arbitration is responsible for his/its respective attorneys fees or other costs of representation.

(2) Location. The arbitration will be conducted in Oakland County, Michigan.

(3) Procedure. At any oral hearing of evidence in connection with the arbitration, each party or its legal counsel will have the right to examine its witnesses and cross-examine the witnesses of any opposing party. No evidence of any witness may be presented in any form unless the opposing party or parties has the opportunity to cross-examine the witness, except under extraordinary circumstances in which the arbitrator determines that the interests of justice require a different procedure.

(4) Decision. Any decision or award of the arbitrator is final and binding on the parties to the arbitration proceeding. The parties agree that the arbitration award may be enforced against the parties to the arbitration proceeding or their assets wherever they may be found and that a judgment on the arbitration award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction.

(5) Power. Nothing contained in this Agreement may be deemed to give the arbitrator any authority, power, or right to alter, change, amend, modify, add to, or subtract from any of the provisions of this Agreement.

The provisions of this Section survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement, are binding on the Corporation's and Grantee's respective successors, heirs, personal representatives, designated beneficiaries and any other person asserting a claim described above, and may not be modified without the consent of the Corporation. To the extent arbitration is required, no person asserting a claim has the right to resort to any federal, state or local court or administrative agency concerning the claim unless expressly provided by federal statute, and the decision of the arbitrator is a complete defense to any action or proceeding instituted in any tribunal or agency with respect to any dispute, unless precluded by federal statute.

5. Code Section 409A. Without limiting the generality of any other provision of this Agreement, Section 11.9 of the Plan pertaining to Code Section 409A is hereby explicitly incorporated herein.

6. No Continued Right as Service Provider. Nothing in the Plan or in this Agreement confers upon the Grantee any right to continue as a Service Provider of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, or interferes with or restricts in any way the rights of the Corporation or any Subsidiary.

7. Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by and is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan, notwithstanding conflict of law provisions.

8. Irrevocable Agreement. Neither the Corporation nor the Grantee may revoke this Agreement. The Corporation's enforcement of the forfeiture provisions in II(A)(1) and II(A)(4) is not a revocation of the Agreement by the Corporation.

(Signature Page Follows)

This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which is deemed an original and all of which constitute one document.

TRIMAS CORPORATION



Dated:	By: Name: ____________________________________ Title: ____________________________________

GRANTEE ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT NOTHING IN THIS RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT, NOR IN THE CORPORATION'S 2006 LONG TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, WHICH IS INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, CONFERS ON GRANTEE ANY RIGHT WITH RESPECT TO CONTINUATION AS A SERVICE PROVIDER OF THE CORPORATION OR ANY PARENT OR SUBSIDIARY, NOR DOES IT INTERFERE IN ANY WAY WITH GRANTEE'S RIGHT OR THE CORPORATION'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE GRANTEE'S SERVICE PROVIDER RELATIONSHIP AT ANY TIME, WITH OR WITHOUT CAUSE AND WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE.

Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and represents that he or she is familiar with the terms and provisions of the Plan. Grantee hereby accepts this Restricted Stock Award subject to all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Grantee has reviewed the Plan and this Restricted Stock Agreement in their entirety. Grantee hereby agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Administrator upon any questions arising under the Plan or this Award.



Dated:	By: Name: ____________________________________ Title: ____________________________________

1277603.2

TRS-093011-Exh 31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(A) and (B))

I, David M. Wathen, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TriMas Corporation;


2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;


c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 27, 2011



	/s/ DAVID M. WATHEN
	David M. Wathen Chief Executive Officer

TRS-093011-Exh 31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(A) and (B))

I, A. Mark Zeffiro, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TriMas Corporation;


2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;


c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 27, 2011



	/s/ A. Mark Zeffiro
	A. Mark Zeffiro Chief Financial Officer

TRS-093011-Exh 32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TriMas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David M. Wathen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 27, 2011



	/s/ DAVID M. WATHEN
	David M. Wathen Chief Executive Officer

TRS-093011-Exh 32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TriMas Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. Mark Zeffiro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 27, 2011



	/s/ A. MARK ZEFFIRO
	A. Mark Zeffiro Chief Financial Officer