TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (continued)
(unaudited)

The bank debt is an obligation of the subsidiaries of the Company. Although the Credit Facility does not restrict the Company's subsidiaries from making distributions to it in respect of the exchange notes, it does contain certain other limitations on the distribution of funds from TriMas Company, LLC, the principal subsidiary, to the Company. The restricted net assets of the guarantor subsidiaries, estimated to be approximately $835.1 million and $812.8 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, are presented in the financial information in Note 15. The Credit Facility contains negative and affirmative covenants and other requirements affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, including among others: restrictions on incurrence of debt, except for permitted acquisitions and subordinated indebtedness, liens, mergers, investments, loans, advances, guarantee obligations, acquisitions, asset dispositions, sale-leaseback transactions greater than $90.0 million if sold at fair market value, hedging agreements, dividends and other restricted junior payments, stock repurchases, transactions with affiliates, restrictive agreements and amendments to charters, by-laws, and other material documents. The Credit Facility also requires the Company and its subsidiaries to meet certain restrictive financial covenants and ratios computed quarterly, including a leverage ratio (total consolidated indebtedness plus outstanding amounts under the accounts receivable securitization facility over consolidated EBITDA, as defined), interest expense ratio (consolidated EBITDA, as defined, over cash interest expense, as defined) and a capital expenditures covenant. The Company was in compliance with its covenants at March 31, 2005.

The 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes due 2012 ("Notes") indenture contains negative and affirmative covenants and other requirements that are comparable to those contained in the Credit Facility. At March 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all such covenant requirements.

The Company paid cash for interest of approximately $5.8 million and $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

8.    Commitments and Contingencies

A civil suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California in December 1988 by the United States of America and the State of California against more than 180 defendants, including us, for alleged release into the environment of hazardous substances disposed of at the Operating Industries, Inc. site in California. This site served for many years as a depository for municipal and industrial waste. The plaintiffs have requested, among other things, that the defendants clean up the contamination at that site. Consent decrees have been entered into by the plaintiffs and a group of the defendants, including us, providing that the consenting parties perform certain remedial work at the site and reimburse the plaintiffs for certain past costs incurred by the plaintiffs at the site. We estimate that our share of the clean-up costs will not exceed $500,000, for which we have insurance proceeds. Plaintiffs had sought other relief such as damages arising out of claims for negligence, trespass, public and private nuisance, and other causes of action, but the consent decree governs the remedy. While, based upon our present knowledge and subject to future legal and factual developments, we do not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow, future legal and factual developments may result in materially adverse expenditures.

As of April 30, 2005, we were a party to approximately 1,470 pending cases involving an aggregate of approximately 19,000 claimants alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos containing materials formerly used in gaskets (both encapsulated and otherwise) manufactured or distributed by certain of our subsidiaries for use in the petrochemical refining and exploration industries. In addition, we acquired various companies to distribute our products that had distributed gaskets of other manufacturers prior to acquisition. We believe that many of our pending cases relate to locations at which none of our gaskets were distributed or used. Total settlement costs for all such cases (exclusive of defense costs), some of which were filed over 13 years ago, have been approximately $3.0 million. All relief sought in the asbestos cases is monetary in nature. We do not

11

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (continued)
(unaudited)

have significant primary insurance to cover our settlement and defense costs. We believe that significant coverage under excess insurance policies of former owners is available to us, but such coverage may be disputed by the insurance carriers and such insurance may ultimately not be available. Further, we may be subjected to significant additional claims in the future, the cost of settling cases in which product identification can be made may increase, and we may be subjected to further claims in respect of the former activities of our acquired gasket distributors. We are unable to make a meaningful statement concerning the monetary claims made in the asbestos cases given that, among other things, claims may be initially made in some jurisdictions without specifying the amount sought or by simply stating the requisite or maximum permissible monetary relief, and may be amended to alter the amount sought. In addition, relatively few of the claims have reached the discovery stage and even fewer claims have gone past the discovery stage. Based on the settlements made to date and the number of claims dismissed or withdrawn for lack of product identification, the Company believes that the relief sought (when specified) does not bear a reasonable relationship to the Company's potential liability. Based upon our experience to date and other available information (including the availability of excess insurance), we do not believe that these cases will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or future results of operations.

The Company has provided reserves based upon its present knowledge and, subject to future legal and factual developments, does not believe that the ultimate outcome of any of the aforementioned litigations will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position and future results of operations and cash flows. However, there can be no assurance that future legal and factual developments will not result in a material adverse impact on our financial condition and future results of operations.

The Company is subject to other claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business, but does not believe that any such claim or litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or future results of operations.

9.    Related Parties

    Metaldyne Corporation

Prior to June 6, 2002, the Company was wholly-owned by Metaldyne Corporation ("Metaldyne") and participated in joint activities including employee benefits programs, legal, treasury, information technology and other general corporate activities.

Effective January 1, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Metaldyne whereby TriMas reimbursed Metaldyne approximately $0.4 million primarily for certain software licenses maintained by Metaldyne under an existing agreement. The aggreement expired on June 30, 2004.

In connection with the June 2002 common stock issuance and related financing transactions, TriMas assumed approximately $37.0 million of liabilities and obligations of Metaldyne, mainly comprised of contractual obligations to former TriMas employees, tax related matters, benefit plan liabilities and reimbursements to Metaldyne for normal course payments to be made on TriMas' behalf. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there were no payments made with respect to these obligations. The remaining assumed liabilities of approximately $7.0 million are payable at various dates in the future and are reported as Due to Metaldyne in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2005.

    Heartland Industrial Partners

The Company is party to an advisory services agreement with Heartland Industrial Partners ("Heartland") at an annual fee of $4.0 million plus expenses. Heartland was paid $1.1 million during

12

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (continued)
(unaudited)

each of the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, for such fees and expenses under this agreement and such amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

    Related Party Sales

The Company sold fastener products to Metaldyne in the amount of approximately $0.1 million during each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The Company also sold fastener products to affiliates of a shareholder in the amount of approximately $1.8 million during each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These amounts are included in net sales in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

10.    Segment Information

TriMas' reportable operating segments are business units that provide unique products and services. Each operating segment is independently managed, requires different technology and marketing strategies and has separate financial information evaluated regularly by the Company's chief operating decision maker in determining resource allocation and assessing performance. TriMas has four operating segments involved in the manufacture and sale of products described below. Within these operating segments, there are no individual products or product families for which reported revenues accounted for more than 10% of the Company's consolidated revenues.

Rieke Packaging Systems — Closures and dispensing systems for steel and plastic industrial and consumer packaging applications.

Cequent Transportation Accessories — Vehicle hitches and receivers, sway controls, weight distribution and fifth-wheel hitches, hitch mounted accessories, roof racks, trailer couplers, winches, jacks, trailer brakes and lights, brake controls, cargo tie-downs, ramps and other vehicle and trailer accessories.

Industrial Specialties — Flame-retardant facings and jacketing and insulation tapes used in conjunction with fiberglass insulation, pressure-sensitive specialty tape products, high-pressure and low-pressure cylinders for the transportation, storage and dispensing of compressed gases, metallic and nonmetallic industrial gaskets, specialty precision tools such as center drills, cutters, end mills, reamers, master gears, gages and punches, specialty engines and service parts and specialty ordnance components and weapon systems.

Fastening Systems — Large and small diameter standard and custom-designed ferrous, nonferrous and special alloy fasteners, specialized fittings and cold-headed parts used in automotive and industrial applications, and highly engineered specialty fasteners for the domestic and international aerospace industry.

The Company's management uses Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA") as a primary indicator of financial operating performance and as a measure of cash generating capability. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change and before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash asset and goodwill impairment write-offs, non-cash losses on sale-leaseback of property and equipment and legacy restricted stock award expense. Legacy restricted stock award expense represents a contractual obligation resulting from the November 2000 acquisition of Metaldyne by Heartland and was fully paid in January 2004.

13

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (continued)
(unaudited)

Segment activity is as follows:

				Three Months Ended
(in thousands)				March 31, 2005				March 31, 2004
Net Sales
Rieke Packaging Systems				$	34,070			$	30,370
Cequent Transportation Accessories					140,650				129,480
Industrial Specialties					73,840				62,360
Fastening Systems					44,190				38,690
Total				$	292,750			$	260,900
Operating Profit
Rieke Packaging Systems				$	7,270			$	5,950
Cequent Transportation Accessories					12,280				13,820
Industrial Specialties					8,510				7,690
Fastening Systems					820				(1,550	)
Corporate expenses and management fees					(5,630	)			(5,770	)
Total				$	23,250			$	20,140
Adjusted EBITDA
Rieke Packaging Systems				$	9,420			$	8,470
Cequent Transportation Accessories					16,890				18,270
Industrial Specialties					10,370				9,510
Fastening Systems					2,350				60
Corporate expenses and management fees					(6,360	)			(6,240	)
Total				$	32,670			$	30,070

11.    Stock Options and Awards

In September 2003, the Company's Board of Directors approved the TriMas Corporation 2002 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which provides for the issuance of equity-based incentives in various forms. A total of 2,222,000 stock options have been approved for issuance under this Plan. As of March 31, 2005, the Company has 1,885,572 stock options outstanding, each of which may be used to purchase one share of the Company's common stock. The options have a ten-year life and the exercise prices range from $20 to $23. Eighty percent of the options vest ratably over three years from the date of grant, while the remaining twenty percent vest after seven years from the date of grant or on an accelerated basis over three years based upon achievement of specified performance targets, as defined in the Plan. The options become exercisable upon the later of: (1) the normal vesting schedule as described above, or (2) upon the occurrence of a qualified public equity offering as defined in the Plan, one half of the vested options become exercisable 180 days following such public equity offering, and the other one half of vested options become exercisable on the first anniversary following consummation of such public offering.

During each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded approximately $0.1 million in non-cash compensation expense related to stock options issued during the first quarter of 2004 with exercise prices below the Company's estimate of fair value of the underlying stock. This non-cash compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

14

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (continued)
(unaudited)

During the first quarter 2005, the Company issued 193,220 options with a weighted average fair value at the date of grant of $5.69 per option. The fair value of these options at the grant date was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: expected life of 6 years; risk-free interest rate of 4%, and; expected volatility of 30%.

The Company has elected to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No 25"). The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), to stock-based employee compensation:

(in thousands, except for per share amounts)				Three Months Ended March 31,
				2005				2004
Net income attributed to common stock, as reported				$	2,510			$	2,220
Add:    Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects					50				30
Deduct:    Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects					(400	)			(230	)
Pro-forma net income attributed to common stock				$	2,160			$	2,020
Net income per share:
Basic, as reported				$	0.13			$	0.11
Basic, pro-forma for stock-based compensation				$	0.11			$	0.10
Diluted, as reported				$	0.13			$	0.11
Diluted, pro-forma for stock-based compensation				$	0.11			$	0.10

Prior to the Metaldyne recapitalization, Metaldyne's Long Term Stock Incentive Plan provided for the issuance of stock-based incentives. Certain of TriMas' salaried employees were holders of restricted stock awards issued under that plan. Under the terms of the Metaldyne recapitalization agreement, holders of restricted stock could elect to receive all of the installment in common shares of Metaldyne stock, 40% in cash and 60% in common shares of Metaldyne stock, or 100% in cash. The number of shares or cash to be received increased by 6% per annum from the stated $16.90 per share value. TriMas was charged directly by Metaldyne for the interest accretion on the stock awards. TriMas did not recognize any compensation expense related to this plan in 2004 or 2005 and obligations accrued related thereto were fully paid in 2004.

12.    Earnings per Share

The Company reports earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Basic and diluted earnings per share amounts were computed using weighted average shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. All outstanding stock options and common stock warrants were excluded from the earnings per share calculations as of March 31, 2005 as they would have been antidilutive.

15

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (continued)
(unaudited)

13.    Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs for TriMas' defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans, covering foreign employees, union hourly employees and certain salaried employees includes the following components for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

(in thousands)				Pension Benefit								Postretirement Benefit
				2005				2004				2005				2004
Service cost				$	150			$	170			$	20			$	20
Interest cost					420				390				90				110
Expected return on plan assets					(460	)			(410	)			—				—
Amortization of net loss					90				50				20				30
Net periodic benefit cost				$	200			$	200			$	130			$	160

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 that it expected to contribute approximately $1.9 million to its pension plan and $0.5 million to its other postretirement benefit plan in 2005.

14.    Impact of Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," which replaces SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") approved a delay to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R). Under the new SEC rule, SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for annual periods that begin after December 31, 2005. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition. Under SFAS No. 123(R), the transition methods include prospective and retroactive adoption options. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) and expects the adoption of this standard will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures provided under SFAS No. 123 and included in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.

15.    Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Combining and Consolidating Financial Statements

Under an indenture dated June 6, 2002, TriMas Corporation, the parent company ("Parent"), issued 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes due 2012 in a total principal amount of $437.8 million (face value). These Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries ("Guarantor Subsidiaries"). All of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Parent and their guarantees are full, unconditional, joint and several. The Company's non-domestic subsidiaries and TSPC, Inc. have not guaranteed the Notes ("Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries"). The Guarantor Subsidiaries have also guaranteed amounts outstanding under the Company's Credit Facility.

The accompanying supplemental guarantor condensed, combining or consolidating financial information is presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the Company's share in the subsidiaries' cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions and other changes in equity. Elimination entries relate primarily to the elimination of investments in subsidiaries and associated intercompany balances and transactions.

16

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Supplemental Guarantor
Condensed Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in thousands)

				As of March 31, 2005
				Parent				Guarantor				Non-Guarantor				Eliminations				Consolidated Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents				$	—			$	890			$	3,030			$	—			$	3,920
Trade receivables, net					—				100,610				30,910				(4,150	)			127,370
Receivables, intercompany					—				6,690				—				(6,690	)			—
Inventories, net					—				158,670				17,930				—				176,600
Deferred income taxes					—				17,210				320				—				17,530
Prepaid expenses and other current assets					—				6,200				1,120				—				7,320
Total current assets					—				290,270				53,310				(10,840	)			332,740
Investments in subsidiaries					835,080				130,520				—				(965,600	)			—
Property and equipment, net					—				143,820				49,510				—				193,330
Goodwill					—				544,670				110,980				—				655,650
Intangibles and other assets					17,850				372,480				22,540				(54,660	)			358,210
Total assets				$	852,930			$	1,481,760			$	236,340			$	(1,031,100	)		$	1,539,930
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current maturities, long-term debt				$	—			$	2,890			$	—			$	—			$	2,890
Accounts payable, trade					—				106,410				26,490				—				132,900
Accounts payable, intercompany					—				—				6,690				(6,690	)			—
Accrued liabilities					12,720				54,980				11,090				(4,150	)			74,640
Due to Metaldyne					—				2,740				—				—				2,740
Total current liabilities					12,720				167,020				44,270				(10,840	)			213,170
Long-term debt					436,250				315,330				50,360				(50,980	)			750,960
Deferred income taxes					—				125,990				11,080				(3,680	)			133,390
Other long-term liabilities					—				34,080				110				—				34,190
Due to Metaldyne.					—				4,260				—				—				4,260
Total liabilities					448,970				646,680				105,820				(65,500	)			1,135,970
Total shareholders' equity					403,960				835,080				130,520				(965,600	)			403,960
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity				$	852,930			$	1,481,760			$	236,340			$	(1,031,100	)		$	1,539,930

17

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Supplemental Guarantor
Condensed Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in thousands)

				As of December 31, 2004
				Parent				Guarantor				Non- Guarantor				Eliminations				Consolidated Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents				$	—			$	520			$	2,570			$	—			$	3,090
Trade receivables, net					—				70,530				27,010				(4,150	)			93,390
Receivables, intercompany					—				5,270				—				(5,270	)			—
Inventories, net					—				154,390				25,650				—				180,040
Deferred income taxes					—				17,210				320				—				17,530
Prepaid expenses and other current assets					—				7,360				1,090				—				8,450
Total current assets					—				255,280				56,640				(9,420	)			302,500
Investments in subsidiaries					812,820				133,010				—				(945,830	)			—
Property and equipment, net					—				147,350				51,260				—				198,610
Goodwill					—				544,270				113,710				—				657,980
Intangibles and other assets					30,470				376,670				22,760				(66,790	)			363,110
Total assets				$	843,290			$	1,456,580			$	244,370			$	(1,022,040	)		$	1,522,200
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current maturities, long-term debt				$	—			$	2,990			$	—			$	—			$	2,990
Accounts payable, trade					—				102,280				32,950				—				135,230
Accounts payable, intercompany					—				—				5,270				(5,270	)			—
Accrued liabilities					1,920				59,030				11,380				(4,150	)			68,180
Due to Metaldyne					—				2,650				—				—				2,650
Total current liabilities					1,920				166,950				49,600				(9,420	)			209,050
Long-term debt					436,210				299,440				50,360				(50,980	)			735,030
Deferred income taxes					—				138,100				11,250				(15,810	)			133,540
Other long-term liabilities					—				35,010				150				—				35,160
Due to Metaldyne.					—				4,260				—				—				4,260
Total liabilities					438,130				643,760				111,360				(76,210	)			1,117,040
Total shareholders' equity					405,160				812,820				133,010				(945,830	)			405,160
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity				$	843,290			$	1,456,580			$	244,370			$	(1,022,040	)		$	1,522,200

18

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Supplemental Guarantor
Condensed Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(in thousands)

				For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
				Parent				Guarantor				Non-Guarantor				Eliminations				Total
Net sales				$	—			$	255,580			$	41,840			$	(4,670	)		$	292,750
Cost of sales					—				(200,850	)			(31,030	)			4,670				(227,210	)
Gross profit					—				54,730				10,810				—				65,540
Selling, general and administrative expenses					—				(35,280	)			(7,250	)			—				(42,530	)
Gain (loss) on dispositions of property and equipment					—				250				(10	)			—				240
Operating profit					—				19,700				3,550				—				23,250
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense					(10,580	)			(6,940	)			(820	)			100				(18,240	)
Other income (expense), net					870				(1,710	)			(150	)			(100	)			(1,090	)
Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries					(9,710	)			11,050				2,580				—				3,920
Income tax (expense) benefit					3,680				(4,420	)			(670	)			—				(1,410	)
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries					8,540				1,910				—				(10,450	)			—
Net income (loss)				$	2,510			$	8,540			$	1,910			$	(10,450	)		$	2,510

				For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
				Parent				Guarantor				Non-Guarantor				Eliminations				Total
Net sales				$	—			$	216,170			$	50,630			$	(5,900	)		$	260,900
Cost of sales					—				(165,830	)			(36,870	)			5,900				(196,800	)
Gross profit					—				50,340				13,760				—				64,100
Selling, general and administrative expenses					—				(38,930	)			(4,780	)			—				(43,710	)
Loss on dispositions of property and equipment					—				(250	)			—				—				(250	)
Operating profit					—				11,160				8,980				—				20,140
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense					(11,120	)			(4,950	)			(420	)			180				(16,310	)
Other income (expense), net					(490	)			(100	)			470				(180	)			(300	)
Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries					(11,610	)			6,110				9,030				—				3,530
Income tax (expense) benefit					3,670				(1,920	)			(3,060	)			—				(1,310	)
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries					10,160				5,970				—				(16,130	)			—
Net income (loss)				$	2,220			$	10,160			$	5,970			$	(16,130	)		$	2,220

19

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Supplemental Guarantor
Condensed Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

				For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
				Parent				Guarantor				Non-Guarantor				Eliminations				Total
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities				$	—			$	9,940			$	(21,290	)		$	—			$	(11,350	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures					—				(3,360	)			(1,190	)			—				(4,550	)
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets					—				940				—				—				940
Net cash used for investing activities					—				(2,420	)			(1,190	)			—				(3,610	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Repayments of borrowings on senior credit facility					—				(720	)			—				—				(720	)
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facility					—				286,810				—				—				286,810
Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facility					—				(270,200	)			—				—				(270,200	)
Payment on note payable					—				(100	)			—				—				(100	)
Intercompany transfers (to) from subsidiaries					—				(22,940	)			22,940				—				—
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities					—				(7,150	)			22,940				—				15,790
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Increase (decrease) for the period					—				370				460				—				830
At beginning of period					—				520				2,570				—				3,090
At end of period				$	—			$	890			$	3,030			$	—			$	3,920

20

---

TRIMAS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Supplemental Guarantor
Condensed Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

				For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
				Parent				Guarantor				Non-Guarantor				Eliminations				Total
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities, net of acquisition impact				$	—			$	19,930			$	1,700			$	—			$	21,630
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures					—				(12,680	)			(2,140	)			—				(14,820	)
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets					—				200				—				—				200
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired					—				(5,430	)			—				—				(5,430	)
Net cash used for investing activities					—				(17,910	)			(2,140	)			—				(20,050	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Repayments of borrowings on senior credit facility					—				(720	)			—				—				(720	)
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facility					—				164,500				—				—				164,500
Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facility					—				(157,500	)			—				—				(157,500	)
Payments on notes payable					—				(7,720	)			—				—				(7,720	)
Intercompany transfers (to) from subsidiaries					—				(2,300	)			2,300				—				—
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities					—				(3,740	)			2,300				—				(1,440	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Increase (decrease) for the period					—				(1,720	)			1,860				—				140
At beginning of period					—				4,180				2,600				—				6,780
At end of period				$	—			$	2,460			$	4,460			$	—			$	6,920

21

---

Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition contains forward-looking statements regarding industry outlook and our expectations regarding the performance of our business. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described under the heading "Forward Looking Statements," at the beginning of this report. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the Company's reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Introduction

We are an industrial manufacturer of highly engineered products serving niche markets in a diverse range of commercial, industrial and consumer applications. We have four operating segments: Rieke Packaging Systems, Cequent Transportation Accessories, Industrial Specialties and Fastening Systems. In reviewing our financial results for the past several years, consideration should be given to certain critical events, particularly our separation from Metaldyne in June 2002, subsequent acquisitions and recent consolidation, integration and restructuring efforts.

Key Factors and Risks Affecting our Reported Results.    Critical factors affecting our ability to succeed include: our ability to successfully pursue organic growth through new product development, cross-selling and product bundling and our ability to quickly and cost effectively introduce new products; our ability to acquire and integrate companies or products that will supplement existing product lines, add new distribution channels, expand our geographic coverage or enable us to absorb overhead costs; our ability to manage our cost structure more efficiently through improved supply base management, internal sourcing and/or purchasing of materials, selective out-sourcing and/or purchasing of support functions, working capital management, and greater leverage of our administrative and overhead functions. If we are unable to do any of the foregoing successfully, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.

Our results of operations depend upon general economic conditions and we serve some customers in highly cyclical industries that are highly competitive and themselves adversely impacted by unfavorable economic conditions. There is some seasonality in our Cequent segment business as well. Sales of towing and trailer products within Cequent are generally stronger in the second and third quarters, as trailer OEMs, distributors and retailers acquire product for the spring/summer selling season. No other operating segment experiences significant seasonal fluctuation in its business. We do not consider backlog orders to be a material factor in our business. A growing portion of our sales may be derived from international sources, which exposes us to certain risks, including currency risks.

Historically, we have not experienced significant fluctuations in raw materials costs which materially impacted our profitability. However, we are sensitive to price movements in our raw materials supply base. Our largest raw materials purchases are for steel, polyethylene and other resins. During 2004 and 2005, we have experienced increasing costs of steel and we are continuing to work with our suppliers to manage cost pressures and disruptions in supply. Additionally, we have initiated pricing programs to pass increased steel costs to customers, although we have experienced a delay in our ability to implement price increases and recover fully such increased costs. We will continue to take actions as necessary to manage risks associated with increasing steel costs. However, we may experience continued increasing costs or disruptions in supply throughout 2005 or longer and we may not be able to pass along such higher costs to our customers in the form of price increases. Such increased costs may adversely impact our earnings. We have substantial debt, interest and lease payment requirements that may restrict our future operations and impair our ability to meet our obligations and, in a rising interest rate environment, our performance may be adversely affected by our degree of leverage.

Our June 2002 Recapitalization and Separation from Metaldyne.    On June 6, 2002, we undertook a recapitalization that resulted in our separation from Metaldyne. Heartland and other investors invested approximately $265.0 million in us and acquired approximately 66% of our fully diluted common stock. Metaldyne retained or received approximately 34% of our fully diluted common stock.

22

---

As part of this recapitalization: (1) we entered into a new credit facility that then consisted of a $150.0 million revolving credit facility and a $260.0 million term loan facility; (2) we entered into a new $125.0 million receivables securitization facility, and; (3) we issued approximately $352.8 million in aggregate principal amount of 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes due 2012. We used the proceeds from these financings to pay a cash dividend to Metaldyne that had been declared immediately prior to the recapitalization and to repay our obligations in respect of Metaldyne financing arrangements. These obligations included borrowings attributed to our subsidiaries under the Metaldyne credit agreement, debt that our subsidiaries owed to Metaldyne and its other subsidiaries and outstanding balances related to receivables that we originated and sold under the Metaldyne receivables facility. In sum, we declared and paid a cash dividend to Metaldyne equal to $840.0 million, less the aggregate amount of such debt repayment and receivables repurchase.

Refer to Note 7, "Long-term Debt," in the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on our current credit facility terms and Note 9, "Related Parties" for additional information concerning other transactions with Metaldyne.

Our Recent Acquisitions.    Since our separation from Metaldyne in June 2002, we have completed seven acquisitions. The most significant of these were the HammerBlow, Highland and Fittings acquisitions. We also completed four smaller acquisitions: Haun Engine in August 2002, Cutting Edge Technologies in January 2003, Chem-Chrome in October 2003 and Bargman in January 2004.

Recent and Anticipated Consolidation, Integration and Restructuring Activities.    We have undertaken significant consolidation, integration and other cost savings programs to enhance our efficiency and achieve cost reduction opportunities arising from our acquisitions. These programs, which were essentially completed as of December 31, 2004, involved a number of major projects and other smaller initiatives to eliminate duplicative and excess manufacturing and distribution facilities, sales forces, and back office and other support functions. The aggregate costs of these actions for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, were approximately $1.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively. We estimate that we will incur approximately $2 million of additional costs during the remainder of 2005 to finalize all actions associated with these programs. We believe all of these costs were warranted by the anticipated future benefits of these actions. In 2004, we completed the establishment of our stand-alone corporate office. We now handle internally the legal, tax, benefit administration and environmental, health and safety services formerly provided by Metaldyne. We have hired an internal audit director, a tax manager, a director of environmental, health and safety and established a stand-alone human resources compensation and benefits function.

During May 2004, in connection with our consolidation, integration and other cost-savings programs within the Cequent Transportation Accessories segment, we announced our decision to cease manufacturing in Oakville, Ontario, and expect to consolidate distribution activities for all Canadian customers in that location. The manufacturing operations have been consolidated into our existing facility located in Goshen, Indiana as of the end of the third quarter of 2004, while we expect to complete consolidation of the distribution activities for all Canadian customers by the end of the second quarter of 2005.

Key Indicators of Performance.    In evaluating our business, our management considers Adjusted EBITDA as a key indicator of financial operating performance and as a measure of cash generating capability. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change and before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash asset and goodwill impairment write-offs, non-cash losses on sale-leaseback of property and equipment and legacy restricted stock award expense. In evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, our management deems it important to consider the quality of our underlying earnings by separately identifying certain costs undertaken to improve our results, such as costs related to consolidating facilities and businesses in an effort to eliminate duplicative costs or achieve efficiencies, costs related to integrating acquisitions and restructuring costs related to expense reduction efforts. Although our consolidation, restructuring and integration efforts are continuing and driven in part by our acquisition activity, our management eliminates these costs to evaluate underlying business performance. Caution must be exercised in eliminating these items as they include substantially (but not necessarily entirely) cash costs and there can be no assurance that

23

---

we will ultimately realize the benefits of these efforts. Moreover, even if the anticipated benefits are realized, they may be offset by other business performance or general economic issues.

Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is the best indicator (together with a careful review of the aforementioned items) of our ability to service and/or incur indebtedness, as we are a highly leveraged company. We use Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure because we believe it facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period and company to company by excluding potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses), and the impact of purchase accounting and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (affecting depreciation and amortization expense). Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use Adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes, to incent and compensate our management personnel, in measuring our performance relative to that of our competitors and in evaluating acquisition opportunities. In addition, we believe Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are widely used by investors, securities analysts, ratings agencies and other interested parties as a measure of financial performance and debt-service capabilities. Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). Some of these limitations are:

•	it does not reflect our cash expenditures for capital equipment or contractual commitments;

•	although depreciation, amortization and asset impairment charges and write-offs are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated, amortized or written-off may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash requirements for such replacements;

•	it does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

•	it does not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our indebtedness;

•	it includes amounts resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of underlying performance of our fundamental business operations, as discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"; and

•	other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. We carefully review our operating profit margins (operating profit as a percentage of net sales) at a segment level, which are discussed in detail in our year-to-year comparison of operating results.

24

---

The following is a reconciliation of our Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

					Three Months Ended March 31,
					2005				2004
					(in thousands)
	Net income				$	2,510			$	2,220
	Income tax expense					1,410				1,310
	Interest expense					18,240				16,310
	Depreciation and amortization					10,510				10,230
	Adjusted EBITDA					32,670				30,070
	Interest paid					(5,780	)			(5,060	)
	Taxes paid					(3,600	)			(2,000	)
	Legacy stock award expense paid					—				(5,400	)
	(Gain) loss on disposition of plant and equipment					(240	)			250
	Payments to Metaldyne to fund contractual liabilities					—				(1,980	)
	Receivables sales and securitization, net					26,560				56,890
	Net change in working capital					(60,960	)			(51,140	)
	Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities				$	(11,350	)		$	21,630

The following details certain items relating to our consolidation, restructuring and integration efforts not eliminated in determining Adjusted EBITDA, but that we would eliminate in evaluating the quality of our Adjusted EBITDA:

					Three Months Ended March 31,
					2005				2004
					(in thousands)
	Facility and business consolidation costs (a)				$	1,230			$	3,000
	Business unit restructuring costs (b)					280				1,250
	Acquisition integration costs (c)					—				1,170
					$	1,510			$	5,420

(a)	Includes employee training, severance and relocation costs, equipment relocation and plant rearrangement costs associated with facility and business consolidations.

(b)	Principally employee severance costs associated with business unit restructuring and other cost reduction activities.

(c)	Includes equipment relocation and other facility closure costs, excess and obsolete inventory reserve charges related to brand rationalization, employee training, and other organization costs associated with the integration of acquired operations.

25

---

Segment Information and Supplemental Analysis

The following table summarizes financial information for our four current operating segments:

					Three Months Ended March 31,
					2005				As a Percentage of Net Sales				2004				As a Percentage of Net Sales
					(in thousands)
	Net Sales:
	Rieke Packaging Systems				$	34,070				11.6	%		$	30,370				11.6	%
	Cequent Transportation Accessories					140,650				48.1	%			129,480				49.7	%
	Industrial Specialties					73,840				25.2	%			62,360				23.9	%
	Fastening Systems					44,190				15.1	%			38,690				14.8	%
	Total				$	292,750				100.0	%		$	260,900				100.0	%
	Gross Profit:
	Rieke Packaging Systems				$	11,850				34.8	%		$	10,610				34.9	%
	Cequent Transportation Accessories					31,910				22.7	%			34,970				27.0	%
	Industrial Specialties					17,000				23.0	%			16,080				25.8	%
	Fastening Systems					4,790				10.8	%			2,700				7.0	%
	Allocated / Corporate expenses					(10	)			—				(260	)			—
	Total				$	65,540				22.4	%		$	64,100				24.6	%
	Selling, General and Administrative:
	Rieke Packaging Systems				$	4,610				13.5	%		$	4,620				15.2	%
	Cequent Transportation Accessories					19,830				14.1	%			20,890				16.1	%
	Industrial Specialties					8,470				11.5	%			8,380				13.4	%
	Fastening Systems					4,000				9.1	%			4,310				11.1	%
	Allocated / Corporate expenses					5,620				—				5,510				—
	Total				$	42,530				14.5	%		$	43,710				16.8	%
	Operating Profit:
	Rieke Packaging Systems				$	7,270				21.3	%		$	5,950				19.6	%
	Cequent Transportation Accessories					12,280				8.7	%			13,820				10.7	%
	Industrial Specialties					8,510				11.5	%			7,690				12.3	%
	Fastening Systems					820				1.9	%			(1,550	)			(4.0	%)
	Allocated / Corporate expenses					(5,630	)			—				(5,770	)			—
	Total				$	23,250				7.9	%		$	20,140				7.7	%

26

---

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2004

The principal factors impacting us during the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2004 were:

(1)	continued economic expansion, particularly in industrial sectors of the economy, which increased customer demand across each of our business segments, most notably Rieke Packaging Systems and Industrial Specialties;

(2)	increased transportation and materials costs, notably steel, resins, yarns, asphalt, foil and other purchased components, which impacted our material margins; and

(3)	completion of the restructuring and consolidation of certain businesses in our Fastening Systems and Industrial Specialties segments.

Net sales increased $31.9 million, or approximately 12.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2004. Of this amount, we estimate approximately $16 million represents steel cost increases passed through to customers, $14 million is due to organic growth and $1.9 million is due to a weaker U.S. dollar. Rieke's net sales increased $3.7 million, or 12.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2004 due to improved sales of core products, increasing new product sales and the favorable impacts of currency exchange. Cequent's net sales increased $11.2 million, or approximately 8.6%, for the first quarter of 2005 as compared with the first quarter of 2004. After consideration of recovery of steel cost increases passed through to customers and the favorable impact of currency exchange, Cequent's sales were approximately flat in the first quarter 2005 compared to the same period a year ago as marginal increases in unit volume demand were approximately offset by significant price competition in the retail channel. Net sales within our Industrial Specialties segment increased $11.5 million, or approximately 18.4%, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2004. Excluding the impact of steel cost increases recovered from customers, sales increased a solid 15.0% as Lamons, Arrow Engine and Norris Cylinder benefited from strong sales of new products, market share gains and overall economic expansion. Net sales in first quarter 2005 for Fastening Systems increased $5.5 million, or 14.2% as compared to first quarter 2004, of which we estimate approximately $4 million represents steel cost increases passed through to customers and $1.5 million is due to continued strong demand for the segment's aerospace fasteners and large diameter bolts used in the heavy truck, construction and agricultural industry markets.

Gross profit margins (gross profit as a percentage of sales) approximated 22.4% and 24.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, respectively. Gross profits within Rieke Packaging Systems improved $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004, as Rieke benefited from increased sales levels. Rieke's gross profit margins were approximately flat between years. Gross profits for Cequent declined $3.1 million for the first quarter 2005 as compared to first quarter 2004 due to the impact of increased steel and other material costs, as well as pricing compression in Cequent's retail after-market business. Gross profits in the first quarter 2005 within Industrial Specialties increased $0.9 million to $17.0 million from $16.1 million in first quarter 2004 due to higher sales levels. However, gross profits as a percentage of sales declined for the three months ended March 31, 2005 to 23.0% from 25.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 primarily as a result of steel cost increases incurred and passed through to customers on which no gross profit was earned and increases in non-steel material costs including foil, yarn, asphalt and other oil-based products, which eroded material margins. Within Fastening Systems, gross profit margins improved from approximately 7.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to approximately 10.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 due to improved material margins on non-steel related items and significantly reduced operational inefficiencies as a result of completing the consolidation and closure of the Lakewood, Ohio facility during the fourth quarter 2004.

Operating profit margins (operating profits as a percentage of sales) approximated 7.9% and 7.7% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operating profit at Rieke improved

27

---

approximately $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2005 as compared with the first quarter of 2004 as Rieke benefited from higher sales volumes and was able to maintain spending levels in selling, general and administrative expenses consistent with the prior year. At Cequent, operating profit declined approximately $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2004, primarily as a result of the aforementioned increases in steel and other material costs and increased promotion expense associated with higher sales activity within the retail channel as compared to the year ago period. Within the Industrial Specialties segment, operating profit increased approximately $0.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as Lamons, Arrow Engine and Norris Cylinder each benefited from higher sales levels during the first quarter as compared to the year ago period. Also, in first quarter 2004, Compac incurred higher costs and opertational inefficiencies associated with the consolidation of its manufacturing activities into its new Hackettstown, New Jersey facility which was completed during the fourth quarter 2004. Within Fastening Systems, the operating loss improved approximately $2.4 million and resulted in an operating profit of $0.8 million for the first quarter of 2005 compared with an operating loss of approximately $1.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This improvement was due primarily to Lake Erie Products having completed the consolidation of its Lakewood, Ohio plant into the remaining facilities in Frankfort, Indiana, and Wood Dale, Illinois. In first quarter 2004, this segment had significant closure and other related costs associated with this plant consolidation activity.

Rieke Packaging Systems.    Net sales increased approximately $3.7 million, or 12.2% to $34.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $30.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Of the $3.7 million increase in sales, approximately $0.6 million was due to the favorable impact of currency exchange as Rieke's reported sales benefited from a weaker U.S. dollar, and $0.6 million was the result of steel cost increases recovered from customers. Also, in first quarter 2005, new product sales increased $3.2 million offset in part by slightly lower core product sales volumes.

Rieke's gross profit margin remained flat at approximately 34.8% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the quarter ended March 30, 2004, as the beneficial impact of increased sales volumes and favorable currency exchange were approximately offset by increased resin and other materials costs not able to be recovered from customers or in the case of steel, recovered from customers but on which no margin was earned.

Rieke's selling, general and administrative costs remained flat at $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, as higher costs associated with ongoing launch activities of new pump dispensing products for consumer applications were approximately offset by costs incurred in first quarter 2004 related to employee severance and maintaining compliance with various health and safety requirements at a European manufacturing facility that did not recur in first quarter 2005.

Overall, Rieke's operating profit margin increased to approximately 21.3% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to approximately 19.6% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, due to increased sales levels between years, the benefit of stronger foreign currencies, and certain employee-related and other regulatory health and safety costs that did not recur in first quarter 2005. These favorable impacts were offset in part by steel cost increases recovered from customers on which no margin was earned, increased resin and other material costs not able to be passed through to customers, and higher launch costs and other promotional activities associated with the ongoing launch of new products.

Cequent Transportation Accessories.    Net sales increased $11.2 million, or approximately 8.6%, to $140.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to approximately $129.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Of this amount, approximately $8.8 million represented steel cost increases recovered from customers and $2.4 million was due to higher unit volume sales and the favorable effects of currency exchange. Overall, in the first quarter 2005, Cequent experienced softening demand for towing products in the wholesale distributor and installer markets due to the existence of adequate inventory levels in these channels. Cequent's sales were also impacted by competitive pricing pressures in all markets but most significantly in the retail channel.

28

---

Cequent's gross profit declined $3.1 million to approximately 22.7% of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 from 27.0% of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. We estimate gross profit margins in first quarter 2005 were approximately 280 basis points lower due to the impact of: (1) higher steel costs incurred not recovered from customers, and (2) higher steel costs incurred and recovered from customers, but on which no gross profit was earned. Gross profit margins were also negatively impacted by higher costs for purchased components and freight that Cequent has not been able to pass through to customers as market demand remains relatively flat and continued pricing pressure from off-shore sources is expected to continue.

Cequent's selling, general and administrative expenses decreased approximately $1.1 million to $19.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 from approximately $20.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In first quarter 2004, Cequent incurred approximately $1.2 million in higher costs related to the consolidation of certain businesses distribution activities in South Bend, Indiana, and ramp-up of that facility's operations. These costs did not recur in first quarter 2005.

Overall, Cequent's operating profit margin decreased from 10.7% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 to 8.7% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 principally due to less demand than expected for towing products in the wholesale distributor installer channel, greater price competition in the retail channel and increased costs of steel, purchased components and other materials that it could not recover from its customers.

Industrial Specialties.    Net sales during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 increased $11.5 million, or approximately 18.4%, compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2004, due to new product introductions, market share gains and overall economic expansion. Of this amount, sales at Lamons increased $3.7 million as it benefited from significant oil refinery turnaround activity with major customers. Sales of Arrow's engines and replacement parts increased $3.3 million or approximately 56.1% as it benefited from high levels of drilling activity in the U.S. and Canada and continued high oil and natural gas prices. Sales at Norris Cylinder, exclusive of steel impacts, increased approximately $1.6 million or 14.2%. In addition, we estimate approximately $2.2 million of the sales increase was due to recovery of steel cost increases passed through to customers, principally at Norris Cylinder.

Gross profit margins at Industrial Specialties decreased to 23.0% of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 from 25.8% of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This decline between periods was principally due to steel cost increases incurred and passed through to customers on which no margin was earned, and increases in non-steel material costs including foil, yarn, asphalt and other oil-based products which eroded material margins overall, partially offset by margins earned on the sales volume increase between years.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales declined to 11.5% in the first quarter 2005 from 13.4% in first quarter 2004, as this segment's businesses benefited from increased sales volumes between periods. Also, in first quarter 2004, we incurred $0.8 million higher costs in connection with the consolidation of Compac's Netcong and Edison, New Jersey facilities to a new facility in Hackettstown, New Jersey. This consolidation was completed in fourth quarter 2004, however, the benefits of this reduction were partially offset as a result of Lamons recording a $0.4 million charge related to asbestos litigation defense costs in first quarter 2005.

Operating profit margins at Industrial Specialties decreased to 11.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from 12.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2004, primarily due to that portion of increased steel costs recovered from customers on which no margin was earned and other material cost increases which could not be recovered from customers, partially offset by the benefits of increased sales volumes across the majority of this segment's businesses and less cost incurred in connection with Compac's consolidation of operating facilities which was completed in fourth quarter 2004.

Fastening Systems.    Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005, increased $5.5 million, or approximately 14.2%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. Of this amount, approximately $4.2 million represents steel cost increases recovered from customers, while the remaining $1.3 million increase was due to continued strong demand for both aerospace fasteners and large diameter bolts used in the heavy truck, construction and agricultural industries.

29

---

Gross profit margins within Fastening Systems improved to 10.8% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 from 7.0% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 due to improved material margins on non-steel related items and significantly reduced operational inefficiencies as a result of completing the consolidation of our Lakewood, Ohio facility into our existing facilities in Frankfort, Indiana and Wood Dale, Illinois.

Selling, general and administrative expenses at Fastening Systems decreased $0.3 million, from $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as the segment was able to maintain spending levels between years.

Overall, operating profit at Fastening Systems improved $2.4 million to an operating profit of $0.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to an operating loss of $1.6 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This change was primarily due to the fact that the first quarter of 2004 reflected closure and other costs and decreased productivity as the result of consolidation of our Lakewood, Ohio facility into our remaining operating facilities. This action was completed in the fourth quarter 2004.

Corporate Expenses and Management Fees.    Corporate office expenses and management fees approximated $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $5.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as the Company's corporate office activities are now fully established.

Interest Expense.    Interest expense increased approximately $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004 due to an increase in our effective interest rate from 4.64% at March 31, 2004 to 6.19% at March 31, 2005, and overall increased borrowings on the revolver in first quarter 2005 to fund increased working capital needs.

Income Taxes.    The effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 36.0% compared to 37.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The decrease in effective rate in the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period a year ago is due to a minor shift in pre-tax income from higher to lower-taxed jurisdictions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

Cash used for operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $11.4 million as compared to cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004 of $21.6 million. Use of cash in first quarter 2005 was to primarily fund higher levels of receivables as a result of increased sales levels over the comparable period a year ago. In first quarter 2004, operating cash flows benefited from the sale of $56.9 million of receivables into our securitization facility while in first quarter 2005, operating cash flow increased only $26.6 million as a result of the sale of certain receivables at one business and the incremental sales of receivables into our securitization facility.

Cash used for investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $3.6 million as compared to $20.1 million for the prior year period. This decrease is due primarily to the acquisition of Theodore Bargman Company in first quarter 2004, 2004 expenditures for our new Hangzhou, China and Hackettstown, New Jersey facilities, and investments related to new product launches, mainly in our Rieke Packaging Systems segment.

Cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $15.8 million as compared to cash used for financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004 of $1.4 million. This increase was due primarily to increased borrowings on our revolving credit facility to fund the aforementioned increase in working capital.

On January 29, 2004, we completed the acquisition of Bargman. The total consideration paid was approximately $5.5 million. The transaction was funded by borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

30

---

Our Debt and Other Commitments

Our credit facility includes a $150.0 million revolving credit facility and a $335.0 million term loan facility (of which $29.4 million and $288.2 million was outstanding as of March 31, 2005, respectively). Up to $100.0 million of our revolving credit facility is available to be used for one or more permitted acquisitions. Our credit facility also provides for an uncommitted $125.0 million incremental term loan facility that, subject to certain conditions, is available to fund one or more permitted acquisitions. Amounts drawn under our revolving credit facility fluctuate daily based upon our working capital and other ordinary course needs. Availability under our revolving credit facility depends upon, among other things, compliance with our credit agreement's financial covenants. Our credit facility contains negative and affirmative covenants and other requirements affecting us and our subsidiaries, including among others: restrictions on incurrence of debt (except for permitted acquisitions and subordinated indebtedness), liens, mergers, investments, loans, advances, guarantee obligations, acquisitions, asset dispositions, sale-leaseback transactions, hedging agreements, dividends and other restricted junior payments, stock repurchases, transactions with affiliates, restrictive agreements and amendments to charters, by-laws, and other material documents. The terms of our credit agreement require us and our subsidiaries to meet certain restrictive financial covenants and ratios computed quarterly, including a leverage ratio (total consolidated indebtedness plus outstanding amounts under the accounts receivable securitization facility over consolidated EBITDA, as defined), interest expense ratio (consolidated EBITDA, as defined, over cash interest expense, as defined) and a capital expenditures covenant, the most restrictive of which is the leverage ratio. Our permitted leverage ratio was 5.5 to 1.00 at March 31, 2005. The permitted leverage ratio becomes more restrictive in future periods, declining to 5.25 to 1.00 at September 30, 2005, 5.00 to 1.00 at December 31, 2005, 4.50 to 1.00 at September 30, 2006 and 4.25 to 1.00 at December 31, 2006. We were in compliance with our covenants at March 31, 2005.

Another important source of liquidity is our $125.0 million accounts receivable securitization facility, under which we have the ability to sell eligible accounts receivable to a third-party multi-seller receivables funding company. At March 31, 2005, we had $59.5 million outstanding under our accounts receivable facility and no funding available. At March 31, 2005, we also had $29.4 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility and had an additional $92.9 million potentially available after giving effect to approximately $27.7 million of letters of credit issued to support our ordinary course needs. However, after consideration of leverage restrictions contained in our credit facility, we had approximately $11.1 million of borrowing capacity available for general corporate purposes.

Principal payments required on the term loan are: $0.7 million due each calendar quarter ending through June 30, 2009, $134.0 million due on September 30, 2009 and $141.8 million due on December 31, 2009.

Our credit facility is guaranteed on a senior secured basis by us and all of our domestic subsidiaries, other than our special purpose receivables subsidiary, on a joint and several basis. In addition, our obligations and the guarantees thereof are secured by substantially all the assets of us and the guarantors.

Our exposure to interest rate risk results from the variable rates under our credit facility. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest, at various rates, as more fully described in Note 7 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2005. Based on amounts outstanding at March 31, 2005, a 1% increase or decrease in the per annum interest rate for our credit facility would change our interest expense by approximately $3.2 million annually.

We have other cash commitments related to leases. We account for these lease transactions as operating leases and annual rent expense related thereto approximates $25.6 million. We expect to continue to utilize leasing as a financing strategy in the future to meet future capital expenditure needs and to reduce debt levels.

We conduct business in several locations throughout the world and are subject to market risk due to changes in the value of foreign currencies. We do not currently use derivative financial instruments to manage these risks. The functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are the local currency in

31

---

the country of domicile. We manage these operating activities at the local level and revenues and costs are generally denominated in local currencies; however, results of operations and assets and liabilities reported in U.S. dollars will fluctuate with changes in exchange rates between such local currencies and the U.S. dollar.

As a result of the financing transactions entered into on June 6, 2002, the additional issuance of $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes, and recent acquisitions, we are highly leveraged. In addition to normal capital expenditures, we may incur significant amounts of additional debt and further burden cash flow in pursuit of our internal growth and acquisition strategies.

We believe that our liquidity and capital resources, including anticipated cash flows from operations, will be sufficient to meet debt service, capital expenditure and other short-term and long-term obligations needs for the foreseeable future, but we are subject to unforeseeable events and risks.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are party to an agreement to sell, on an ongoing basis, the trade accounts receivable of certain business operations to a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote, special purpose subsidiary, TSPC, Inc. ("TSPC"). TSPC, subject to certain conditions, may from time to time sell an undivided fractional ownership interest in the pool of domestic receivables, up to approximately $125.0 million, to a third party multi-seller receivables funding company, or conduit. The proceeds of the sale are less than the face amount of accounts receivable sold by an amount that approximates the purchaser's financing costs. Upon sale of receivables, our subsidiaries that originated the receivables retain a subordinated interest. Under the terms of the agreement, new receivables can be added to the pool as collections reduce receivables previously sold. The facility is an important source of liquidity. At March 31, 2005, we had $59.5 million outstanding and no funding available under this facility.

The facility is subject to customary termination events, including, but not limited to, breach of representations or warranties, the existence of any event that materially adversely affects the collectability of receivables or performance by a seller and certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency. The agreement expires on June 6, 2005. If we are unable to renew or replace this facility, it could materially and adversely affect our liquidity.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following discussion of accounting policies is intended to supplement the accounting policies presented in Note 3 to our 2004 audited financial statements. Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, our evaluation of business and macroeconomic trends, and information from other outside sources as appropriate.

Receivables.    Receivables are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $5.9 million at March 31, 2005. We monitor our exposure for credit losses and maintain adequate allowances for doubtful accounts. We determine these allowances based on historical write-off experience and/or specific customer circumstances and provide such allowances when amounts are reasonably estimable and it is probable a loss has been incurred. We do not have concentrations of accounts receivable with a single customer or group of customers and do not believe that significant credit risk exists due to our diverse customer base. Trade accounts receivable of substantially all domestic business operations may be sold, on an ongoing basis, to TSPC.

Depreciation and Amortization.    Depreciation is computed principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Annual depreciation rates are as follows: buildings and buildings/land improvements, ten to 40 years, and machinery and equipment, three to 15 years. Capitalized debt issuance costs are amortized over the underlying terms of the related debt securities. Customer relationship intangibles are amortized over periods ranging from six to 40 years, while technology and other intangibles are amortized over periods ranging from one to 30 years.

32

---

Goodwill and Other Intangibles.    We test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis, unless a change in business condition occurs which requires a more frequent evaluation. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, we estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using the present value of expected future cash flows and other valuation measures. We then compare this estimated fair value with the net asset carrying value. If carrying value exceeds fair value, then a possible impairment of goodwill exists and further evaluation is performed. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually as of December 31 using management's operating budget and five-year forecast to estimate expected future cash flows. However, projecting discounted future cash flows requires us to make significant estimates regarding future revenues and expense, projected capital expenditures, changes in working capital and the appropriate discount rate. While we believe our judgments and estimates are reasonable, if actual results differ significantly from our current estimates, we could experience an impairment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles that may be required to be recorded in future periods.

We review definite-lived intangible assets as events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The factors considered by management in performing these assessments include current operating results, business prospects, customer retention, market trends, potential product obsolescence, competitive activities and other economic factors. Future changes in our business or the markets for our products could result in impairments of other intangible assets that might be required to be recorded in future periods.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions.    We account for pension benefits and postretirement benefits other than pensions in accordance with the requirements of SFAS Nos. 87, 88, 106, and 132. Annual net periodic expense and accrued benefit obligations recorded with respect to our defined benefit plans are determined on an actuarial basis. We, together with our third-party actuaries, determine assumptions used in the actuarial calculations which impact reported plan obligations and expense. Annually, we and our actuaries review the actual experience compared to the most significant assumptions used and make adjustments to the assumptions, if warranted. The healthcare trend rates are reviewed with the actuaries based upon the results of their review of claims experience. Discount rates are based upon an expected benefit payments duration analysis and the equivalent average yield rate for high-quality fixed-income investments. Pension benefits are funded through deposits with trustees and the expected long-term rate of return on fund assets is based upon actual historical returns modified for known changes in the market and any expected change in investment policy. Postretirement benefits are not funded and our policy is to pay these benefits as they become due. Certain accounting guidance, including the guidance applicable to pensions, does not require immediate recognition or the effects of a deviation between actual and assumed experience or the revision of an estimate. This approach allows the favorable and unfavorable effects that fall within an acceptable range to be netted.

Income Taxes.    Income taxes are accounted for using the provisions of SFAS No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109"). Deferred income taxes are provided at currently enacted income tax rates for the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities and carry-forward items. The effective tax rate and the tax bases of assets and liabilities reflect management's estimates based on then-current facts. We continually review the need for and adequacy of valuation allowances if it is more likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate the current year effective tax rate and deferred tax positions are appropriate. However, actual outcomes may differ from our current estimates and assumptions.

Other Loss Reserves.    We have other loss exposures related to environmental claims, asbestos claims and litigation. Establishing loss reserves for these matters requires the use of estimates and judgment in regard to risk exposure and ultimate liability. We are generally self-insured for losses and liabilities related principally to workers' compensation, health and welfare claims and comprehensive general, product and vehicle liability. Generally, we are responsible for up to $0.5 million per occurrence under our retention program for workers' compensation, between $0.3 million and $2.0 million per occurrence under our retention programs for comprehensive general, product and vehicle liability, and have a $0.3 million per occurrence stop-loss limit with respect to our self-insured group

33

---

medical plan. We accrue loss reserves up to our retention amounts based upon our estimates of the ultimate liability for claims incurred, including an estimate of related litigation defense costs, and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported using actuarial assumptions about future events. We accrue for such items in accordance with SFAS No. 5 when such amounts are reasonably estimable and probable. We utilize known facts and historical trends, as well as actuarial valuations in determining estimated required reserves. Changes in assumptions for factors such as medical costs and actual experience could cause these estimates to change significantly.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We are also subject to interest risk as it relates to long-term debt. See Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for details about our primary market risks, and the objectives and strategies used to manage these risks. Also see Note 7, "Long-term Debt," in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

As of March 31, 2005, an evaluation was carried out by management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (the "Exchange Act")) pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed only to provide reasonable assurance that they will meet their objectives. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2005, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that they will meet their objectives.

Changes in disclosure controls and procedures

In connection with preliminary implementation activities to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404, and as more fully disclosed in its Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company identified certain control deficiencies at its Consumer Products business unit within its Cequent Transportation Accessories segment. During the fourth quarter 2004, the Company initiated various actions to remediate the control deficiencies noted and continued their implementation during the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005. These actions included hiring a new controller, revising its monthly accounting and closing processes and controls, and the addition of supplemental financial resources to assist with effectively implementing the revised monthly accounting and control activities.

34

---

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

A civil suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California in December 1988 by the United States of America and the State of California against more than 180 defendants, including us, for alleged release into the environment of hazardous substances disposed of at the Operating Industries, Inc. site in California. This site served for many years as a depository for municipal and industrial waste. The plaintiffs have requested, among other things, that the defendants clean up the contamination at that site. Consent decrees have been entered into by the plaintiffs and a group of the defendants, including us, providing that the consenting parties perform certain remedial work at the site and reimburse the plaintiffs for certain past costs incurred by the plaintiffs at the site. We estimate that our share of the clean-up costs will not exceed $500,000, for which we have insurance proceeds. Plaintiffs had sought other relief such as damages arising out of claims for negligence, trespass, public and private nuisance, and other causes of action, but the consent decree governs the remedy. While, based upon our present knowledge and subject to future legal and factual developments, we do not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow, future legal and factual developments may result in materially adverse expenditures.

As of April 30, 2005, we were a party to approximately 1,470 pending cases involving an aggregate of approximately 19,000 claimants alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos containing materials formerly used in gaskets (both encapsulated and otherwise) manufactured or distributed by certain of our subsidiaries for use in the petrochemical refining and exploration industries. In addition, we acquired various companies to distribute our products that had distributed gaskets of other manufacturers prior to acquisition. We believe that many of our pending cases relate to locations at which none of our gaskets were distributed or used. Total settlement costs (exclusive of defense costs) for all such cases, some of which were filed over 13 years ago, have been approximately $3.0 million. All relief sought in the asbestos cases is monetary in nature. We do not have significant primary insurance to cover our settlement and defense costs. We believe that significant coverage under excess insurance policies of former owners is available to us, but such coverage may be disputed by the insurance carriers and such insurance may ultimately not be available. Further, we may be subjected to significant additional claims in the future, the cost of settling cases in which product identification can be made may increase, and we may be subjected to further claims in respect of the former activities of our acquired gasket distributors. We are unable to make a meaningful statement concerning the monetary claims made in the asbestos cases given that, among other things, claims may be initially made in some jurisdictions without specifying the amount sought or by simply stating the requisite or maximum permissible monetary relief, and may be amended to alter the amount sought. In addition, relatively few of the claims have reached the discovery stage and even fewer claims have gone past the discovery stage. Based on the settlements made to date and the number of claims dismissed or withdrawn for lack of product identification, the Company believes that the relief sought (when specified) does not bear a reasonable relationship to the Company's potential liability. Based upon our experience to date and other available information (including the availability of excess insurance), we do not believe that these cases will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or future results of operations.

The Company has provided reserves based upon its present knowledge and, subject to future legal and factual developments, does not believe that the ultimate outcome of any of the aforementioned litigations will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position and future results of operations and cash flows. However, there can be no assurance that future legal and factual developments will not result in a material adverse impact on our financial condition and future results of operations.

The Company is subject to other claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business, but does not believe that any such claim or litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or future results of operations.

35

---

Item 2.    Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

None of our securities, which are not registered under the Securities Act, have been issued or sold by us during the period covered by this report.

Items 3, 4 and 5

Not applicable.

Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)    Exhibits:

	3.1 (a)	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TriMas Corporation.

	3.2 (a)	Amended and Restated By-laws of TriMas Corporation.

	4.1 (a)	Indenture relating to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes, dated as of June 6, 2002, by and among TriMas Corporation, each of the Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as trustee.

	4.2 (a)	Form of note (included in Exhibit 4.1(a)).

	4.3 (a)	Registration Rights Agreement relating to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes issued June 6, 2002 dated as of June 6, 2002 by and among TriMas Corporation and the parties named therein.

	4.4 (b)	Registration Rights Agreement relating to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes issued December 10, 2002 dated as of December 10, 2002 by and among TriMas Corporation and the parties named therein.

	4.5 (c)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 4, 2003.

	4.6 (d)	Supplemental Indenture No. 2 dated as of May 9, 2003.

	4.7 (e)	Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated as of August 6, 2003.

	31.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	31.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(a)	Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed on October 4, 2002 (File No. 333-100351).

(b)	Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed on January 28, 2003 (File No. 333-100351).

(c)	Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003 (File No. 333-100351).

(d)	Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed June 9, 2003 (File No. 333-105950).

(e)	Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2003 (File No. 333-100351).

36

---

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TriMas Corporation     (Registrant)

Date:  May 16, 2005	By:	/s/ E.R. Autry                     E.R. Autry Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

37

---

Exhibit 31.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(A) and (B))

I, Grant H. Beard, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TriMas Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005	/s/ Grant H. Beard                                      Grant H. Beard Chief Executive Officer

---

Exhibit 31.2

Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(A) and (B))

I, E.R. Autry, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TriMas Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 16, 2005	/s/ E.R. Autry                                 E.R. Autry Chief Financial Officer

---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TriMas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant H. Beard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005	/s/ Grant H. Beard                         Grant H. Beard Chief Executive Officer

---

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TriMas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E.R. Autry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005	/s/ E.R. Autry                                 E.R. Autry Chief Financial Officer

---